↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal Muscle Development

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Skeletal Muscle Development'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Bisulfite Sequencing for DNA Methylation Analysis of Primary Muscle Stem Cells
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Whole Genome Chromatin IP-Sequencing (ChIP-Seq) in Skeletal Muscle Cells
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Analysis of RNA Expression in Adult Zebrafish Skeletal Muscle
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Targeted Lipidomic Analysis of Myoblasts by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Measuring Mitochondrial Substrate Utilization in Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Microcontact-Printed Hydrogel Microwell Arrays for Clonal Muscle Stem Cell Cultures
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation, Culture, and Differentiation of Fibro/Adipogenic Progenitors (FAPs) from Skeletal Muscle
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Human Satellite Cell Isolation and Xenotransplantation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Application of Split-GFP Reassembly Assay to Study Myogenesis and Myofusion In Vitro
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Myogenic Maturation by Optical-Training in Cultured Skeletal Muscle Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Fabrication of Micromolded Gelatin Hydrogels for Long-Term Culture of Aligned Skeletal Myotubes
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Quantification of Embryonic Myofiber Development by Immunofluorescence
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 How to Wire the Diaphragm: Wholemount Staining Methods to Analyze Mammalian Respiratory Innervation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Membrane Repair Assay for Human Skeletal Muscle Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Cryoinjury Model for Tissue Injury and Repair in Bioengineered Human Striated Muscle
Attention for Chapter 7: Isolation, Culture, and Differentiation of Fibro/Adipogenic Progenitors (FAPs) from Skeletal Muscle
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Isolation, Culture, and Differentiation of Fibro/Adipogenic Progenitors (FAPs) from Skeletal Muscle
Chapter number 7
Book title
Skeletal Muscle Development
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7283-8_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7282-1, 978-1-4939-7283-8
Authors

Judson, Robert N., Low, Marcela, Eisner, Christine, Rossi, Fabio M., Robert N. Judson, Marcela Low, Christine Eisner, Fabio M. Rossi

Abstract

Fibro/Adipogenic Progenitors (FAPs) are a multipotent progenitor population resident in skeletal muscle. During development and regeneration, FAPs provide trophic support to myogenic progenitors that is required for muscle fiber maturation and specification. FAPs also represent a major cellular source of fibrosis in degenerative disease states, highlighting them as a potential cellular target for anti-fibrotic muscle therapies. Effective and reproducible methods to isolate and culture highly purified FAP populations are therefore critical to further understand their biology. Here, we describe a fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) based protocol to isolate CD31-/CD45-/Integrin-α7-/Sca1+ FAPs from murine skeletal muscle including details of tissue collection and enzymatic muscle digestion. We also incorporate optimized methods of expanding and differentiated FAPs in vitro. Together, this protocol provides a complete workflow to study skeletal muscle derived FAPs and compliments downstream analytical, drug screening, and disease modeling applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,718,108
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#912
of 13,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,675
of 317,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#6
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.