You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Use of RP4::Mini-Mu for Gene Transfer
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Bacteriophages
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7341-5, 978-1-4939-7343-9
|
Authors |
Frédérique Van Gijsegem, Van Gijsegem, Frédérique |
Abstract |
Gene cloning is an invaluable technique in genetic analysis and exploitation of genetic properties of a broad range of bacteria. Numerous in vitro molecular cloning protocols have been devised but the efficiency of these techniques relies on the frequency with which the recombinant DNA can be introduced in the recipient strain. Here, we describe an in vivo gene transfer and cloning technique based on transposable bacteriophage Mu property to rearrange its host genome. This technique uses the broad host range plasmid RP4 carrying a transposable mini-MuA(+) derivative and was successfully used as well in enteric as in environmental nonenteric bacteria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,483,026
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,388
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,710
of 442,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.