↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Multidrug Exporters

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bacterial Multidrug Exporters'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 High-Resolution Crystallographic Analysis of AcrB Using Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (DARPins)
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Crystallographic Analysis of Drug and Inhibitor-Binding Structure of RND-Type Multidrug Exporter AcrB in Physiologically Relevant Asymmetric Crystals
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Crystallographic Analysis of MATE-Type Multidrug Exporter with Its Inhibitors
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Crystallographic Analysis of the CusBA Heavy-Metal Efflux Complex of Escherichia coli
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Purification of AcrAB-TolC Multidrug Efflux Pump for Cryo-EM Analysis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 NMR Spectroscopy Approach to Study the Structure, Orientation, and Mechanism of the Multidrug Exporter EmrE
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Generation of Conformation-Specific Antibody Fragments for Crystallization of the Multidrug Resistance Transporter MdfA
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Biochemical Reconstitution and Characterization of Multicomponent Drug Efflux Transporters
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Covalently Linked Trimers of RND (Resistance-Nodulation-Division) Efflux Transporters to Study Their Mechanism of Action: Escherichia coli AcrB Multidrug Exporter as an Example
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Determining Ligand Path Through a Major Drug Transporter, AcrB, in Escherichia coli
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Molecular Modeling of Multidrug Properties of Resistance Nodulation Division (RND) Transporters
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Transcriptomic Approach to Identify Novel Drug Efflux Pumps in Bacteria
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Regulation of the Expression of Bacterial Multidrug Exporters by Two-Component Signal Transduction Systems
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Study of the Expression of Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps in Anaerobic Conditions
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Identification of a Staphylococcus aureus Efflux Pump Regulator Using a DNA–Protein Affinity Technique
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 High-Throughput Flow Cytometry Screening of Multidrug Efflux Systems
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Single-Molecule Analysis of Membrane Transporter Activity by Means of a Microsystem
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Large-Scale Femtoliter Droplet Array for Single Cell Efflux Assay of Bacteria
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Reconstitution and Transport Analysis of Eukaryotic Transporters in the Post-Genomic Era
Attention for Chapter 18: Large-Scale Femtoliter Droplet Array for Single Cell Efflux Assay of Bacteria
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Large-Scale Femtoliter Droplet Array for Single Cell Efflux Assay of Bacteria
Chapter number 18
Book title
Bacterial Multidrug Exporters
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7454-2_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7452-8, 978-1-4939-7454-2
Authors

Ryota Iino, Shouichi Sakakihara, Yoshimi Matsumoto, Kunihiko Nishino

Abstract

Large-scale femtoliter droplet array as a platform for single cell efflux assay of bacteria is described. Device microfabrication, femtoliter droplet array formation and concomitant enclosure of single bacterial cells, fluorescence-based detection of efflux activity at the single cell level, and collection of single cells from droplet and subsequent gene analysis are described in detail.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,632,564
of 12,211,623 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,803
of 8,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,690
of 338,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#506
of 1,604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,211,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.