You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Programmed Cell Death
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
Programmed Cell Death
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3581-9_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3579-6, 978-1-4939-3581-9
|
| Authors |
Kueh, Andrew J, Herold, Marco J, Kueh, Andrew J., Herold, Marco J., Andrew J. Kueh, Marco J. Herold |
| Abstract |
Clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 technology has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for generating targeted mutations in cell lines and mice. However, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 in a constitutively expressed manner can often result in low targeting efficiencies and lethality due to mutations in essential genes. Here, we describe the use of an inducible lentiviral vector platform, enabling rapid transduction and enrichment of CRISPR/Cas9 positive cells and high levels of targeted mutations upon induction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,390,619
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,915
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,233
of 394,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,054
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.