↓ Skip to main content

Programmed Cell Death

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Programmed Cell Death'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Detection of Apoptotic Versus Autophagic Cell Death by Flow Cytometry
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Vivo Apoptosis Imaging Using Site-Specifically 68 Ga-Labeled Annexin V
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Detection of Active Caspases During Apoptosis Using Fluorescent Activity-Based Probes
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Detection of Initiator Caspase Induced Proximity in Single Cells by Caspase Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 In Vitro Use of Peptide Based Substrates and Inhibitors of Apoptotic Caspases
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Programmed Cell Death
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Analysis of Cell Death Induction in Intestinal Organoids In Vitro
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 In Vitro Differentiation of Mouse Granulocytes
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Programmed Cell Death
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Isolation of Cardiomyocytes and Cardiofibroblasts for Ex Vivo Analysis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Programmed Cell Death
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Programmed Cell Death
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Modeling Metazoan Apoptotic Pathways in Yeast
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Characterizing Bcl-2 Family Protein Conformation and Oligomerization Using Cross-Linking and Antibody Gel-Shift in Conjunction with Native PAGE
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Using Förster-Resonance Energy Transfer to Measure Protein Interactions Between Bcl-2 Family Proteins on Mitochondrial Membranes
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Preparing Samples for Crystallization of Bcl-2 Family Complexes
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Programmed Cell Death
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Programmed Cell Death
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Programmed Cell Death
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Proteomic Profiling of Cell Death: Stable Isotope Labeling and Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Attention for Chapter 6: Programmed Cell Death
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Programmed Cell Death
Chapter number 6
Book title
Programmed Cell Death
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3581-9_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3579-6, 978-1-4939-3581-9
Authors

Doerflinger, Marcel, Glab, Jason, Puthalakath, Hamsa, Marcel Doerflinger, Jason Glab, Hamsa Puthalakath

Abstract

Sepsis is amongst the world's biggest public health problems with more than 20 million cases worldwide and a high morbidity rate of up to 50 %. Despite advances in modern medicine in the past few decades, incidence is expected to further increase due to an aging population and accompanying comorbidities such as cancer and diabetes. Due to the complexity of the disease, available treatment options are limited. Growing evidence links apoptotic cell death of lymphocytes and concomitant immune suppression to overall patient survival. In order to establish novel therapeutic approaches targeting this life threatening immune paralysis, researchers rely heavily on animal models to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying this high impact disease. Here we describe variations of in vivo mouse models that can be used to study inflammation, cellular apoptosis, and survival in mice subjected to experimental polymicrobial sepsis and to a secondary infection during the immune suppressive secondary stage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,678,105
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,489
of 13,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,566
of 396,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#550
of 1,474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.