RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk https://t.co/ALULhD7Vzf
RT @LindaDouw: Data sharing according to @nejm: "research parasites", really?! https://t.co/jvtf45YuJo
I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.co/kzrYESj7bQ
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
NEJM https://t.co/bjoBDScgqv I wonder if @NEJM have got this right? Reproducibility and #opendata are keys to progress
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @c_althaus: .@NEJM thinks disproving research findings by reanalyzing original data is wrong and calls those who do “parasites” https://…
.@nejm so now data scientists = research parasites? what a fearful and backward way to view informatics work https://t.co/dTwPuGis6z
RT @schneiderleonid: #IAmAResearchParasite @NEJM claims in editorial shared data leads to it being stolen by research parasites. No joke ht…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @rezendi: "or even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited" https://t.co/CXOtFvBaU7 #yesthatisinfact…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/E2OiZ1X5v3 thinking on appropriate attribution for use of others clinical data #ISMPP
..."but use another group’s data for their own ends..." That's called meta-analysis Don... https://t.co/gyPY54iHgS
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
Nice Data sharing success story. https://t.co/BJqxZBZHbX
Provocative / badly formulated argument:data sharing is not enough for reproducibility of science.Need context too. https://t.co/HpCDihEiyA
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @FWFOpenAccess: Controversial editorial @NEJM: Do authors have to offer co-authorship if they use others data? https://t.co/N2r62UBTWr #…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @schneiderleonid: #IAmAResearchParasite @NEJM claims in editorial shared data leads to it being stolen by research parasites. No joke ht…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
If you use others data then you're a "parasite". Wow, can't even fathom how this stinker got to see the light of day https://t.co/bkNg5P4F98
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @FWFOpenAccess: Controversial editorial @NEJM: Do authors have to offer co-authorship if they use others data? https://t.co/N2r62UBTWr #…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @FWFOpenAccess: Controversial editorial @NEJM: Do authors have to offer co-authorship if they use others data? https://t.co/N2r62UBTWr #…
"#Data Sharing" by New England Journal of Medecine https://t.co/i3iDsKtJdQ
Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM https://t.co/3OLwOi9xTM
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @FWFOpenAccess: Controversial editorial @NEJM: Do authors have to offer co-authorship if they use others data? https://t.co/N2r62UBTWr #…
RT @FWFOpenAccess: Controversial editorial @NEJM: Do authors have to offer co-authorship if they use others data? https://t.co/N2r62UBTWr #…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @UCBITSS: Wow. I think both the aerial view and the nitty-gritty view of data-sharing are beautiful, not "parasitic." https://t.co/WWk3T…
Controversial editorial @NEJM: Do authors have to offer co-authorship if they use others data? https://t.co/N2r62UBTWr #IAmAResearchParasite
After the first paragraph I thought: "Hey, it must be Fools' Day!" @SciTransit @Piwdb @dgmacarthur @skathire https://t.co/9Z9iJGoaba
Wow. I think both the aerial view and the nitty-gritty view of data-sharing are beautiful, not "parasitic." https://t.co/WWk3TTKum7
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Wow. Slow clap for the NEJM please. I thought #reproducibility is part of the scientific process. @SciTransit https://t.co/9Z9iJG6yMA
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Idea of sharing and collaborating is great-but what happens when 1 party is not interested? Need open data instead. https://t.co/PyAqJHThpZ
RT @michaelhoffman: Unidentified "concern held by some" weasel words followed by exhortations from editors not to behave "parasitically" ht…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
"or even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited" https://t.co/CXOtFvBaU7 #yesthatisinfactthewholepoint
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @smvamosi: Heck of a week for editorials... #researchparasites #getyourheadoutofyouknowwhere https://t.co/7U90harvah
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/oMio1NDwmD
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
Según @NEJM reutilizar datos de otro grupo en un nuevo estudio te hace un "#researchparasites". https://t.co/uTl3SMWlEx
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…