↓ Skip to main content

International Perspectives on Engineering Education

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'International Perspectives on Engineering Education'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Historical Survey of the Structural Changes in the American System of Engineering Education
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Role of Research in Academic Drift Processes in European and American Professional Engineering Education Outside the Universities
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Structural Transformations in Higher Engineering Education in Europe
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Engineering Brazil: National Engineering Capability at Stake
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Engineering Education in India: A Comprehensive Overview
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Engineering Education in Slavic Languages Countries
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Confucianism, Marxism, and Pragmatism: The Intellectual Contexts of Engineering Education in China
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Meritocracy, Technocracy, Democracy: Understandings of Racial and Gender Equity in American Engineering Education
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Challenges of Overcoming Structural Barriers for African American Engineers in the United States and in the African Diaspora
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Depoliticization and the Structure of Engineering Education
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Bridging Sustainable Community Development and Social Justice
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Energy Ethics in Science and Engineering Education
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Engineering for the Real World: Diversity, Innovation and Hands-on Learning
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Fostering Hybridity: Teaching About Context in Engineering Education
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Constructions of the Core of Engineering: Technology and Design as Modes of Social Intervention
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Transforming Engineering Education: For Technological Innovation and Social Development
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Appropriate Curricula for Engineering Management Programmes: A South African Approach
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Design-Based Research: A Strategy for Change in Engineering Education
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Engineering Education Research as Engineering Research
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Analyzing Context by Design: Engineering Education Reform via Social-Technical Integration
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 PDS: Engineering as Problem Definition and Solution
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Implementing Social Awareness into Engineering Curricula
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Engineering as a Socio-technical Process: Case-Based Learning from the Example of Wind Technology Development
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Getting Context Back in Engineering Education
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Techno-anthropology and Engineering Education: Between Hybridity and Social Responsibility
Attention for Chapter 1: A Historical Survey of the Structural Changes in the American System of Engineering Education
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Historical Survey of the Structural Changes in the American System of Engineering Education
Chapter number 1
Book title
International Perspectives on Engineering Education
Published in
Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_1
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-916168-6, 978-3-31-916169-3
Authors

Atsushi Akera, Bruce Seely

Editors

Steen Hyldgaard Christensen, Christelle Didier, Andrew Jamison, Martin Meganck, Carl Mitcham, Byron Newberry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 17%
Engineering 2 17%
Social Sciences 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,732,227
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy of Engineering and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,591
of 362,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy of Engineering and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them