@Permagardenet @GeraldKutney Ignoring how? Those weren't globally warm or cool everywhere at the same time. And not close to the warming we are experiencing now. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
RT @Veritatem2021: We have 800,000 years of ice core data showing repeated warming and cooling. It is called natural climate variability.
So climate change was regional for 4.6 billion years until the Industrial Revolution and then it became global? Or do you accept that global climate change has happened many times in the past? If so, when.
@RunRun94025061 @iltasanomat 1/3 Kaikki uusi lämpötilahistoriatutkimus viittaa siihen, että mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ollut olemassa. Kuvassa juuri eilen ilmestynyt Esper et al (2024). Ks. myös: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx Pidemmän aikavälin kuluess
@ManAboutMorse @BellRoniBell @Veritatem2021 No: - https://t.co/2LkUZWW7GM LIA & MWP were regional: - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm - previous Quaternary warming and cooling was related to Milankovitch cycles (+amplification by natural CO2 cycling): - http
@RobertWager1 @braggpuss little ice age was not global event, and your graph conveniently cuts off the last quarter of a centuary of accelerated warming. You shouldn't take one screenshot of a graph in isolation. Look at the actual evidence base. https://t
RT @Veritatem2021: We have 800,000 years of ice core data showing repeated warming and cooling. It is called natural climate variability.
RT @Veritatem2021: We have 800,000 years of ice core data showing repeated warming and cooling. It is called natural climate variability.
RT @Veritatem2021: Afraid not. We have more than enough proxy data showing that these climate changes were indeed global. The claim that c…
RT @Veritatem2021: Afraid not. We have more than enough proxy data showing that these climate changes were indeed global. The claim that c…
RT @Veritatem2021: Afraid not. We have more than enough proxy data showing that these climate changes were indeed global. The claim that c…
RT @Veritatem2021: We have 800,000 years of ice core data showing repeated warming and cooling. It is called natural climate variability.
RT @Veritatem2021: We have 800,000 years of ice core data showing repeated warming and cooling. It is called natural climate variability.
RT @Veritatem2021: Afraid not. We have more than enough proxy data showing that these climate changes were indeed global. The claim that c…
@Veritatem2021 Desperate strawman. No one has claimed that global climate hasn't changed previously. However, LIA and MWP were essentially regional. Ice cores record regional records (up to ~1855) and are not the gotcha you want them to be. https://t.co/fn
@Veritatem2021 No one has claimed "climate changes were only regional until the Industrial Revolution". However, LIA and MWP were essentially regional. Ice cores record regional records (up to ~1855) and are not the gotcha you want them to be. https://t.c
We have 800,000 years of ice core data showing repeated warming and cooling. It is called natural climate variability.
Afraid not. We have more than enough proxy data showing that these climate changes were indeed global. The claim that climate changes were only regional until the Industrial Revolution is total and utter baloney which is peddled to try to prop up the coll
@directorblue @GeraldKutney Greenland being warmer doesn't mean Earth was warmer https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/Btf45wUzPT
@7777rep @WeatherProf In Europe! It wasn't globally warm everywhere at the same time https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@FonfredeMichel @AssoClimatoReal Excusez-moi, mais votre message est incompréhensible. Pourriez-vous, s'il vous plait, faire des phrases ? Par ailleurs, vous n'avez toujours pas partagé les références de vos données (ignorées selon vous par les climatolog
@amedee_cha53384 @jo_desx @GattepailleMy @marietouss1 L'optimum climatique médiéval n'a pas été global mais régional (Europe/Atlantique N). Il fait plus chaud aujourd'hui qu'alors (on n'est plus en 1950…) Neukom et a.l 2019. No evidence for globally cohe
@FonfredeMichel @Barba_Phil51323 @AssoClimatoReal Pour expliquer la petite bosse du MWP, la lecture de cet article est intéressante. Il faut un réchauffement global et pas régional… Neukom et al. 2019: No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold perio
@Jbaudrandbros @AssoClimatoReal @NiusMarco L'optimum médiéval n'a pas été global. Cf. Neukom et al 2019 No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era (https://t.co/ipZaRzjbp7) Mais si vous voulez voici la croiss
@Pyrael_USA @POTUS Nope, the MWP was not warmer than today (it was warmer than 1950, though…) More there was not a global and synchronous warm period in the Middle-Age. https://t.co/oyFSCV3crR
@socratesccost And isn’t the medieval warm period thought to be regional at best? https://t.co/7mrOHGLpUV
@Adre_N @PasiJJunnila Ja uusimman lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaanhan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei edes ole ollut olemassa. Vain ajallisesti ja paikallisesti hajanaisia kylmiä kausia muutaman vuosisadan ajan lähihistoriassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1
@SRNybakke @lmichael_98 @BSquatF @ClimateDad77 It's not global. https://t.co/YLrQBolWI4
@akaelwopo1 @_ClimateCraze Not according to this study https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/kCulSTyk0K
@akaelwopo1 @_ClimateCraze You use blogs as evidence and meanwhile there are actual global temperature reconstruction studies that completely disagree with the position held by the blog https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/YAfe3Pn1yj
@bannister_28644 @agentsinaction Not warm everywhere at the sane time https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@RunRun94025061 @hanneskivinen @tomi_koivunen @UllaKaukola Kumoa @RunRun94025061 tuo @hanneskivinen esittämä argumentti, jos pystyt. Pientä jääkautta ei uusimman lämpötilahistoriatutkimksen mukaan ole globaalisti ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx htt
@ute_lias @AtteKaleva Mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole nykytutkimuksen mukaan ollut olemassa, Lopeta disinformaation levittäminen, @ute_lias. https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/8pK2qqlP4l
@akaelwopo1 @_ClimateCraze No they don't because they don't show global data, unlike this study that unambiguously states the evidence doesn't support the theory of global warm and cool periods in the recent past https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@BillSmith17404 @WeatherProf LIA wasn’t global. https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@bjames280961 @bannister_28644 @agentsinaction The anti science wicket - not warmer everywhere at the same time. A very important distinction. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@bannister_28644 @agentsinaction You really need to learn time. MWP wasn't globally warm everywhere at the same TIME! https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@KattoKimi @PelliPetja Nykykäsityksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta, josta olisimme "tulossa pois", ei ole ollut olemassa. Peredy asioihin, älä levitä disinformaatiota. https://t.co/C2TPFLQWho https://t.co/byy1Kipk0Y
@DeepCitizen506 @ProfMarkMaslin @SustainableUCL @UCLEnvironment @AnthropoceneUCL @UCLgeography @BBCJustinR @LancetCountdown @JustStop_Oil @RogerHallamCS21 That's a science denier blog.😅 The MWP was regional, NOT global, & was not warmer than today. "
RT @Ceist8: @OSUgrad73 @TheDisproof Incorrect. The MWP was regional, NOT global, & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for…
RT @Ceist8: @OSUgrad73 @TheDisproof Incorrect. The MWP was regional, NOT global, & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for…
@CBarrabran @str_xs @alangnixon @25_cycle @agentsinaction @dimeinurear @hairymarx1 @ejwwest @ProphetSholto @HmGinYYC @thomasdenmark @BOM_au The MWP was regional, NOT global, & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent wa
RT @Ceist8: @TheDisproof @tintreg @OSUgrad73 Exactly
@TheDisproof @tintreg @OSUgrad73 Exactly
@tintreg @TheDisproof @OSUgrad73 Incorrect. Scientists use proxy data that overlaps and correlates with the instrumental data
@tintreg @TheDisproof @OSUgrad73 Yes, we do
@OSUgrad73 @TheDisproof Incorrect. The MWP was regional, NOT global, & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" PAGES2K 2019 https://t.co/F4v4EZMEmC https://t.
@Jehanne2024 @SergeZaka @AssoClimatoReal Et il n'y a pas eu d'optimum climatique médiéval ou romain synchrone et GLOBAL. Neukom et al. 2019 No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era https://t.co/ipZaRzjbp7
RT @SteB777: @AndyGoldney @JohnRussell40 Self-evidently you are a denier, and denier of reality of evidence and science. Unprecedented, me…
@cohler https://t.co/kRbTxqq9df And https://t.co/z0Dl97eRcL to get you started.
@AndyGoldney @JohnRussell40 Self-evidently you are a denier, and denier of reality of evidence and science. Unprecedented, means what it says. It means not recorded before, in the recent and relevant history. Claims that it was warmer before in the Roman
@Mujhunter @JohnRussell40 Complete and utter bs https://t.co/WBKKZpk7tB https://t.co/ZFbyZieaot
@bannister_28644 @ECOWARRIORSS The paper is pretty evident. https://t.co/YLrQBolWI4
@hairymarx1 @agentsinaction @ProphetSholto @ejwwest @JohnMashey @25_cycle @dimeinurear @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @thomasdenmark @theAGU We've advanced our knowledge since the 1990's (30 years ago). We now know that the MWP was not global. There is "No evidence for
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark Q: Why do "skeptics"…
@ProphetSholto @ejwwest @25_cycle @hairymarx1 @alangnixon @dimeinurear @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @thomasdenmark Denying science and reality is what religions and you do. So, another projection, cultist. And we ARE in an ice age, kid. Learn the basics first. Go to
@ProphetSholto @HmGinYYC @25_cycle @hairymarx1 @alangnixon @dimeinurear @Ceist8 @thomasdenmark I didn't. I already told you you shouldn't lie. We ARE in an ice age, science denier. And the MWP wasn't like today. Stop lying. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF Start
@AssoClimatoReal @Kenneth72712993 Le problème c'est la non-simultanéité de vos exemples. Pour avoir un effet global, il faut que ce soit global et simultané… Neukom et al 2019. No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustri
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark Q: Why do "skeptics"…
@dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a graph by Michael Mann from the last century, the general results of which have been replicated dozens of times via
@dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark The MWP and LIA were regional not global "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era"- PAGES2K 2019 https://t.co
@bannister_28644 @25_cycle @JordanBakerBK @_ClimateCraze The MWP happened but it was regional warming, not global warming
@bannister_28644 @25_cycle @JordanBakerBK @_ClimateCraze You didn't read the paper that refuted Loehle's flawed 2007 paper. Not only was it flawed, it wasn't GLOBAL mean temperature. The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. http
@bannister_28644 @25_cycle @JordanBakerBK @_ClimateCraze You posted a dishonest blog article from a fossil fuel lobby group Clintel. The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold
@karppari @HarriLuuppala @peikko763 @MVirtanen @SimoRuoho Maallikko voi nimenomaan kuvitella, että pieni jääkausi on globaalisti ollut olemassa, mutta mikään uudempi lämpötilahistoriatutkimus ei tue sen olemassaoloa: https://t.co/C2TPFLQWho https://t.co/pt
@PullNews @agentsinaction @ejwwest @Ceist8 @RSalgadoDArcy Vinòs claims there has been a simultaneous medieval warm period. Wrong. He uses a reconstruction of T+ of 30N-90N as the world temp. Not correct. Neukon et al 2019. No evidence for globally cohere
@UncleleClub1 @M1guelSuna @ErkkilaJorma 1/2: Mitään globaalia pikku jääkautta ei nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/C2TPFLQWho https://t.co/rX6uj6S0IR
@SchneidGabriel @Hamersteen @BMcNoldy Just fucking no: https://t.co/7WhPL5HrF0
@MatzyOw @Jallu2353569513 @hjalla_aho @FolioTuukka @naukuvanaakka Nykykäsityksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa (kuva ja linkki). Lämpenemisen vaikutukset tulevaisuudessa kaiken tutkimuskirjallisuuden mukaan ovat pääsääntöis
@RandomRation @fredco1948 Yet there is no evidence the little ice age was a global event https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
@Pinheir58339900 @GeraldKutney Again you are not reading any actual science https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@kissingtruth @rozjonez @RogerCoppock @Ceist8 The MWP was not global though https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
@TopAlliedAceWW1 Yeah, global temperature reconstructions happened. Now there's plenty of evidence that says those events were regional. https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/zuplyquvFc
RT @ed_hawkins: No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era https://t.co/TNRYpdlTI2
@Lukas18865903 @MeteoprognozaPL @PogodaMeteo @mariog5tw Mapa winnic w Szkocji. MWP było lokalne, dotyczyło głównie Europy, a nie globalne jak obecnie. https://t.co/3ig9HZQcwY https://t.co/u8EcHAAuVf
@Tartoquetsches1 @thopelep @Europhobe Non, il n'y a pas eu d'optimum climatique mondial. Ce fut une succession de phénomènes régionaux non synchronisés. https://t.co/ipZaRzjbp7
@VapausVille @juliasangervo UHI-efekti ei taida kovin olennaisesti selittää havaittua lämpenemistä, kun meretkin kuitenkin lämpenevät kuvien (1 & 2) malliin. Pientä jääkautta ei ole globaalisti ollut nykytutkimuksen käsityksen mukaan (3. kuva): https:/
RT @agentsinaction: @S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy Stopy lying. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy You are too dumb for me. You are such an id*ot, I don't have time for you, stupid kid and troll. You will never get the basic things, a 3yo child can understand. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/cqkMbqsy8T
RT @Ceist8: @JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria None of them are GLOBAL studies. They are individual studies from d…
@JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria You linked to a crank blog with a map with individual studies from different locations over different time periods. Many are not temperature proxies. See: "No evidence for globally coherent warm
@badmoonrising11 @JanNordhagen2 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Study is based on 692 proxies from 648 locations showing the MWP was not global & not warmer than t
RT @Ceist8: @JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria None of them are GLOBAL studies. They are individual studies from d…
@JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria None of them are GLOBAL studies. They are individual studies from different locations over different time periods. Many are not temperature proxies. Study based on 692 proxies from 648 location