↓ Skip to main content

Plant Proteostasis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Proteostasis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Approaches to Determine Protein Ubiquitination Residue Types
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Immunoprecipitation of Cullin-RING Ligases (CRLs) in Arabidopsis thaliana Seedlings
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Radioligand Binding Assays for Determining Dissociation Constants of Phytohormone Receptors
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Measuring the Enzyme Activity of Arabidopsis Deubiquitylating Enzymes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Fluorescent Reporters for Ubiquitin-Dependent Proteolysis in Plants
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Generation of Artificial N-end Rule Substrate Proteins In Vivo and In Vitro
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Plant Proteostasis
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Plant Proteostasis
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Kinetic Analysis of Plant SUMO Conjugation Machinery
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Expression, Purification, and Enzymatic Analysis of Plant SUMO Proteases
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Quantitative Analysis of Subcellular Distribution of the SUMO Conjugation System by Confocal Microscopy Imaging
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Plant Proteostasis
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Plant Proteostasis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Protocols for Studying Protein Stability in an Arabidopsis Protoplast Transient Expression System
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Detection and Quantification of Protein Aggregates in Plants.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Determination of Protein Carbonylation and Proteasome Activity in Seeds
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Isobaric Tag for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ)-Based Protein Profiling in Plants
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Plant Proteostasis
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 In Vivo Radiolabeling of Arabidopsis Chloroplast Proteins and Separation of Thylakoid Membrane Complexes by Blue Native PAGE
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Normalized Quantitative Western Blotting Based on Standardized Fluorescent Labeling
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Sequence Search and Comparative Genomic Analysis of SUMO-Activating Enzymes Using CoGe
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Plant Proteostasis
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Bioinformatics Tools for Exploring the SUMO Gene Network
Attention for Chapter 20: Normalized Quantitative Western Blotting Based on Standardized Fluorescent Labeling
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Normalized Quantitative Western Blotting Based on Standardized Fluorescent Labeling
Chapter number 20
Book title
Plant Proteostasis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3759-2_20
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3757-8, 978-1-4939-3759-2
Authors

Frederik Faden, Lennart Eschen-Lippold, Nico Dissmeyer

Editors

L. Maria Lois, Rune Matthiesen

Abstract

Western blot (WB) analysis is the most widely used method to monitor expression of proteins of interest in protein extracts of high complexity derived from diverse experimental setups. WB allows the rapid and specific detection of a target protein, such as non-tagged endogenous proteins as well as protein-epitope tag fusions depending on the availability of specific antibodies. To generate quantitative data from independent samples within one experiment and to allow accurate inter-experimental quantification, a reliable and reproducible method to standardize and normalize WB data is indispensable. To date, it is a standard procedure to normalize individual bands of immunodetected proteins of interest from a WB lane to other individual bands of so-called housekeeping proteins of the same sample lane. These are usually detected by an independent antibody or colorimetric detection and do not reflect the real total protein of a sample. Housekeeping proteins-assumed to be constitutively expressed mostly independent of developmental and environmental states-can greatly differ in their expression under these various conditions. Therefore, they actually do not represent a reliable reference to normalize the target protein's abundance to the total amount of protein contained in each lane of a blot.Here, we demonstrate the Smart Protein Layers (SPL) technology, a combination of fluorescent standards and a stain-free fluorescence-based visualization of total protein in gels and after transfer via WB. SPL allows a rapid and highly sensitive protein visualization and quantification with a sensitivity comparable to conventional silver staining with a 1000-fold higher dynamic range. For normalization, standardization and quantification of protein gels and WBs, a sample-dependent bi-fluorescent standard reagent is applied and, for accurate quantification of data derived from different experiments, a second calibration standard is used. Together, the precise quantification of protein expression by lane-to-lane, gel-to-gel, and blot-to-blot comparisons is facilitated especially with respect to experiments in the area of proteostasis dealing with highly variable protein levels and involving protein degradation mutants and treatments modulating protein abundance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 22%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 19%