You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Electron Microscopy of Ebola Virus-Infected Cells
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 19 |
Book title |
Ebolaviruses
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7116-9_19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7115-2, 978-1-4939-7116-9
|
Authors |
Takeshi Noda, Noda, Takeshi |
Editors |
Thomas Hoenen, Allison Groseth |
Abstract |
Ebola virus (EBOV) replicates in host cells, where both viral and cellular components show morphological changes during the process of viral replication from entry to budding. These steps in the replication cycle can be studied using electron microscopy (EM), including transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which is one of the most useful methods for visualizing EBOV particles and EBOV-infected cells at the ultrastructural level. This chapter describes conventional methods for EM sample preparation of cultured cells infected with EBOV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 44% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 33% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,464,404
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,379
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,229
of 421,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#468
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.