↓ Skip to main content

Marburg- and Ebolaviruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Filovirus Research: How it Began
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Filovirus Research: How it Began
Chapter number 8
Book title
Marburg- and Ebolaviruses
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/82_2017_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-968946-3, 978-3-31-968948-7
Authors

Werner Slenczka, Slenczka, Werner

Abstract

The first reported filovirus outbreak occurred in August 1967, when laboratory workers in Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany, and Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia) became infected with an unknown highly pathogenic agent. The disease was characterized by high fever, malaise, rash, hemorrhagic and tetanic manifestations, and high lethality, amounting to 25%. The disease was introduced to Europe by grivets (Chlorocebus aethiops), which were used for biomedical research and vaccine production. The causative agent, Marburg virus, was isolated and identified by scientists of the University of Marburg, Germany in cooperation with specialists for viral electron microscopy at the Bernhard Nocht Institute in Hamburg, Germany. In this chapter, Dr. Slenczka, who was involved in the first isolation of Marburg virus in 1967, describes the desperate hunt of the causative agent of this first filovirus disease outbreak in the center of Europe, its successful isolation, the likely route of transmission from a monkey trading station to vaccine production facilities in Germany and Yugoslavia, and the consequences of this outbreak, including a shortage in the production of poliomyelitis vaccine In addition, this chapter provides insight into some of the peculiarities of filovirus infection, such as sexual virus transmission several months after recovery and the role of Ca(2+)-loss in Marburg virus pathogenesis, which were already observed during this first well-documented Marburg virus disease outbreak.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,701,599
of 23,953,397 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#194
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,930
of 427,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,953,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.