↓ Skip to main content

Marburg- and Ebolaviruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Filovirus Structural Biology: The Molecules in the Machine
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 689)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Filovirus Structural Biology: The Molecules in the Machine
Chapter number 16
Book title
Marburg- and Ebolaviruses
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/82_2017_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-968946-3, 978-3-31-968948-7
Authors

Robert N. Kirchdoerfer, Hal Wasserman, Gaya K. Amarasinghe, Erica Ollmann Saphire

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe what is known thus far about the structures and functions of the handful of proteins encoded by filovirus genomes. Amongst the fascinating findings of the last decade is the plurality of functions and structures that these polypeptides can adopt. Many of the encoded proteins can play multiple, distinct roles in the virus life cycle, although the mechanisms by which these functions are determined and controlled remain mostly veiled. Further, some filovirus proteins are multistructural: adopting different oligomeric assemblies and sometimes, different tertiary structures to achieve their separate, and equally essential functions. Structures, and the functions they dictate, are described for components of the nucleocapsid, the matrix, and the surface and secreted glycoproteins.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 295. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#103,444
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#3
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,597
of 423,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.