↓ Skip to main content

Marburg- and Ebolaviruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 53: Accelerating Vaccine Development During the 2013–2016 West African Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Accelerating Vaccine Development During the 2013–2016 West African Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak
Chapter number 53
Book title
Marburg- and Ebolaviruses
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/82_2017_53
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-968946-3, 978-3-31-968948-7
Authors

Elizabeth S. Higgs, Sheri A. Dubey, Beth A. G. Coller, Jakub K. Simon, Laura Bollinger, Robert A. Sorenson, Barthalomew Wilson, Martha C. Nason, Lisa E. Hensley

Abstract

The Ebola virus disease outbreak that began in Western Africa in December 2013 was unprecedented in both scope and spread, and the global response was slower and less coherent than was optimal given the scale and pace of the epidemic. Past experience with limited localized outbreaks, lack of licensed medical countermeasures, reluctance by first responders to direct scarce resources to clinical research, community resistance to outside interventions, and lack of local infrastructure were among the factors delaying clinical research during the outbreak. Despite these hurdles, the global health community succeeded in accelerating Ebola virus vaccine development, in a 5-month interval initiating phase I trials in humans in September 2014 and initiating phase II/III trails in February 2015. Each of the three Ebola virus disease-affected countries, Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Liberia, conducted a phase II/III Ebola virus vaccine trial. Only one of these trials evaluating recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing Ebola virus glycoprotein demonstrated vaccine efficacy using an innovative mobile ring vaccination trial design based on a ring vaccination strategy responsible for eradicating smallpox that reached areas of new outbreaks. Thoughtful and intensive community engagement in each country enabled the critical community partnership and acceptance of the phase II/III in each country. Due to the delayed clinical trial initiation, relative to the epidemiologic peak of the outbreak in the three countries, vaccine interventions may or may not have played a major role in bringing the epidemic under control. Having demonstrated that clinical trials can be performed during a large outbreak, the global research community can now build on the experience to implement trials more rapidly and efficiently in future outbreaks. Incorporating clinical research needs into planning for future health emergencies and understanding what kind of trial designs is needed for reliable results in an epidemic of limited duration should improve global response to future infectious disease outbreaks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 22%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 21 38%