You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Northwestern Blot Analysis: Detecting RNA–Protein Interaction After Gel Separation of Protein Mixture
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3591-8_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3589-5, 978-1-4939-3591-8
|
| Authors |
Shangbing Zang, Ren-Jang Lin, Zang, Shangbing, Lin, Ren-Jang |
| Abstract |
Northwestern assays detect a direct binding of a given RNA molecule to a protein immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Here, we describe protocols to prepare (32)P-labeled RNA probes and to use them to assay for RNA-protein interactions after partially purified protein preparations are resolved on denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The method can unambiguously determine whether the protein of interest can directly and independently bind RNA even in the presence of contaminating bacterial proteins or degradation products that at times may hinder interpretation of results obtained from gel mobility shift or RNP immunoprecipitation assays. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,403
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,264
of 394,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#546
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.