↓ Skip to main content

Preface.

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Preface.'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Identification of mRNA-Interacting Factors by MS2-TRAP (MS2-Tagged RNA Affinity Purification)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Biotin–Streptavidin Affinity Purification of RNA–Protein Complexes Assembled In Vitro
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Detecting RNA–Protein Interaction Using End-Labeled Biotinylated RNA Oligonucleotides and Immunoblotting
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Purification of RNA–Protein Splicing Complexes Using a Tagged Protein from In Vitro Splicing Reaction Mixture
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Loading of Argonaute Protein with Small Duplex RNA in Cellular Extracts
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Single-Turnover Kinetics of Methyl Transfer to tRNA by Methyltransferases
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Northwestern Blot Analysis: Detecting RNA–Protein Interaction After Gel Separation of Protein Mixture
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Ribo-Proteomics Approach to Profile RNA–Protein and Protein–Protein Interaction Networks
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Evolution of Cell-Type-Specific RNA Aptamers Via Live Cell-Based SELEX
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Informational Suppression to Probe RNA:RNA Interactions in the Context of Ribonucleoproteins: U1 and 5′ Splice-Site Base-Pairing
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Analysis of Alternative Pre-RNA Splicing in the Mouse Retina Using a Fluorescent Reporter
Attention for Chapter 9: RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
Chapter number 9
Book title
RNA-Protein Complexes and Interactions
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3591-8_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3589-5, 978-1-4939-3591-8
Authors

Huang, Chao, Wu, Guowei, Yu, Yi-Tao, Chao Huang, Guowei Wu, Yi-Tao Yu

Abstract

Pseudouridylation is the most abundant and widespread RNA modification, and it plays an important role in modulating the structure and function of RNA. In eukaryotes and archaea, RNA pseudouridylation is catalyzed largely by box H/ACA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs), a distinct group of RNA-protein complexes each consisting of a unique RNA and four common proteins. The RNA component of the complex serves as a guide that base-pairs with its substrate RNA and specifies the target uridine to be modified. In order to systematically study the function and mechanism of pseudouridylation, it is desirable to have a reconstitution system in which biochemically purified/reconstituted box H/ACA RNPs are capable of introducing pseudouridines into an RNA at any target site. Here, we describe a method for the reconstitution of functional box H/ACA RNPs using designer box H/ACA guide RNAs, which in principle can be adopted to reconstitute other RNA-protein complexes as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Researcher 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Chemical Engineering 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,315,221
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,917
of 13,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,662
of 393,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,053
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.