↓ Skip to main content

Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Speciation of Cadmium in the Environment
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 134)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Speciation of Cadmium in the Environment
Chapter number 3
Book title
Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality
Published in
Metal ions in life sciences, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5179-8_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-075178-1, 978-9-40-075179-8
Authors

Francesco Crea, Claudia Foti, Demetrio Milea, Silvio Sammartano

Abstract

This chapter reports an analysis of literature dedicated to the speciation of cadmium in various environmental compartments, i.e., atmosphere, natural waters, soils and sediments. The difficulty of the cadmium speciation studies, due to the variability of composition of different natural systems and to the low cadmium concentration in the environment, is highlighted. As an alternative approach, cadmium behavior is assessed by modelling its reactivity towards the main classes of ligands usually present in natural systems. The stability of cadmium complexes with various ligand classes is analyzed and modelled. Simple equations are proposed for the estimation of the stability of cadmium complexes with carboxylates, amines, amino acids, complexones, phosphates, phosphonates, and thiolates. The modelling ability of these equations is carefully analyzed. In addition, the sequestering ability of some ligands toward cadmium has been evaluated by the calculation of pL(0.5) (the total ligand concentration, as -log c (L), able to bind 50% of a metal cation), an empirical parameter recently proposed for an objective "quantification" of this ability in defined conditions (pH, ionic strength, temperature, composition of solution).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Moldova, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 27%
Chemistry 9 14%
Engineering 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Metal ions in life sciences
#47
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,399
of 396,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metal ions in life sciences
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.