You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Evaluating Blood Cell Populations in Xenopus Using Flow Cytometry and Differential Counts by Cytospin
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 19 |
| Book title |
Xenopus
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-8784-9_19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-8783-2, 978-1-4939-8784-9
|
| Authors |
Robert, Jacques, Edholm, Eva-Stina, De Jesus Andino, Francisco, Jacques Robert, Eva-Stina Edholm, Francisco De Jesus Andino |
| Abstract |
Analyses by flow cytometry and differential counts by cytospin of peripheral blood leukocytes are two reliable and convenient methods used to assess the immune status and immune responses in the amphibian Xenopus. Here, we describe these methods and discuss their challenges and limitations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,648,325
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,990
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,911
of 442,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.