散歩は1日に7500歩でじゅうぶん!よくこんなの数量化する気になるなあ、すごい。
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
Where did "you need to walk 10,000 steps per day" come from? "Significant benefit" is seen at less than half of that, 4400 steps, and this benefit appears to plateau at 7500.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @smead2: Of some value but I’m skeptical about how you can confidently control for confounding related to undiagnosed or unreported como…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
10,000 steps.
RT @MehmetE_Krkmz: Herkes için 10000 adım/gün: ?? Bu çalışma (>16000 kadın, ort. 72 y) egzersize bağlı mortalite yararının 4400 adımda baş…
FAO @KaraCHoover
Of some value but I’m skeptical about how you can confidently control for confounding related to undiagnosed or unreported comorbidities
Fascinating result! Optimal associated mortality benefit at 4,400 steps/day.
RT @AntmijAntonio: Caminar más de 7500 pasos al día, se asocia con tasas de mortalidad más bajas. Association of Step Volume and Intensity…
RT @Arrianna_Planey: 10,000 steps a day: Another ‘fact’ with more basis in marketing than in EBP https://t.co/W5uBNS8LuP
RT @monkeyalien: 每天走7500步就足以续命了,再多益处不是很大。 (平均年龄72岁的老年女性,干预指标包括步数、行走强度、行走速度,最后发现能够显著降低全因死亡率的主要指标还是步数。日步数提升到7500步之前,全因死亡率是逐渐下降的;超过7500步后全因死亡率…
This is really important!
RT @theresaboyle: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women - The JAMA Network https://t.co/VuNCeHwp…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Total steps per day leveling out at 7500 is quite the visual! But conclusions on intensity should be interpreted with caution. Very small #s engaging in 2.5mph continuous and not enough doing 3.5mph to even include in analyses.
RT @ProfDavidHunter: Association of Step Volume With Mortality in Older Women. As few as 4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower m…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @stephenjduckett: Looks like, at least for older women, target shd be <10000/day: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Caus…
In SG, my average is 6,000 steps on workdays, in Jakarta my average is half that on gym days. 😣
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women - The JAMA Network https://t.co/VuNCeHwp5V via @nuzzel
RT @monkeyalien: 每天走7500步就足以续命了,再多益处不是很大。 (平均年龄72岁的老年女性,干预指标包括步数、行走强度、行走速度,最后发现能够显著降低全因死亡率的主要指标还是步数。日步数提升到7500步之前,全因死亡率是逐渐下降的;超过7500步后全因死亡率…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @drsonyacressman: Good news, 4,400 steps/day is enough! #DigitalHealth #mhealth https://t.co/CCTcF2OELB
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/fpJ2ogbTGC
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @drsonyacressman: Good news, 4,400 steps/day is enough! #DigitalHealth #mhealth https://t.co/CCTcF2OELB
Good news, 4,400 steps/day is enough! #DigitalHealth #mhealth
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
No matter how old you are, you need to get moving. If you want to live longer that is!!! #PhysicalActivity #steps #wellness "Among older women, as few as 4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with 2700 steps/d" https:/
RT @AGORACOM: Good news for people who can't hit 10,000 steps per day. Less is more, so get walking and get your heart in shape! SPONSOR:…
RT @RV_Physio: 🚶♀️(+) de pas, (+) de vie🚶 👥 N = 16700 femmes, âge moyen 72 ans ⏱ Suivi de 4,3 ans ; 504 femmes décédées ❤️ 4400 pas/j…
Ok, so you do not have to do 10,000 steps per day! Findings: In this cohort study of 16 741 women with a mean age of 72 years, steps per day were measured over 7 days. Women who averaged approximately... https://t.co/LYHM9XcmKD
RT @monkeyalien: 每天走7500步就足以续命了,再多益处不是很大。 (平均年龄72岁的老年女性,干预指标包括步数、行走强度、行走速度,最后发现能够显著降低全因死亡率的主要指标还是步数。日步数提升到7500步之前,全因死亡率是逐渐下降的;超过7500步后全因死亡率…
RT @ELHOC_Research: ¿Cuantos pasos deberían caminar las mujeres adultas mayores para reducir su riesgo de mortalidad prematura? Este nuevo…
@SchTorsten another one about the 10,000 steps
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @ELHOC_Research: ¿Cuantos pasos deberían caminar las mujeres adultas mayores para reducir su riesgo de mortalidad prematura? Este nuevo…
RT @Arrianna_Planey: 10,000 steps a day: Another ‘fact’ with more basis in marketing than in EBP https://t.co/W5uBNS8LuP
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @mpwpaulus: Good evidence that there is no magic in 10000 steps, but some activity is healthy https://t.co/LjoihnPteM
RT @Arrianna_Planey: 10,000 steps a day: Another ‘fact’ with more basis in marketing than in EBP https://t.co/W5uBNS8LuP
RT @exerciseworks: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women Conclusions and Relevance Among older…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Important to note that there was a levelling off of additional mortality benefit at ~7500 steps/day - another result questioning the 10,000 step/day target. ‘More’ may be better, but not necessary, & an unachievable target may be discouraging
RT @christianruck: Det där att du måste gå MINST 10000 steg verkar inte stämma. Se artikel med intressant diskussion bla med @EikoFried i k…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Bright side: Just 7,500 steps a day is correlated with an improvement in mortality. Not a hugely hard goal to hit!
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @DraK36354275: Moverse siempre va a dar ventaja en salud. No subestimen caminar y usar escaleras. https://t.co/qXGEbBjlw3
Moverse siempre va a dar ventaja en salud. No subestimen caminar y usar escaleras.
"#FitnessTrackers have been programmed to deliver fireworks and streamers when a user hits #10000steps in a day, but people may not need to walk that far to see benefits" See corresponding research at https://t.co/iqSJSA1nAu https://t.co/mwauVaddBu
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @NightShiftMD: Now you tell me! https://t.co/Y53V4Srnhn
RT @YSandstrm: Puh! Mindre stressad över att stegmätaren sällan visar 10.000 https://t.co/aVZwanRKwV
RT @endogenetica: Estudo muito interessante sobre os benefícios de caminhar para saúde. Os benefícios já existem com >4.400 passos por dia…
Wie zei 10000 stappen? 😜
RT @ELHOC_Research: ¿Cuantos pasos deberían caminar las mujeres adultas mayores para reducir su riesgo de mortalidad prematura? Este nuevo…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @RV_Physio: 🚶♀️(+) de pas, (+) de vie🚶 👥 N = 16700 femmes, âge moyen 72 ans ⏱ Suivi de 4,3 ans ; 504 femmes décédées ❤️ 4400 pas/j…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @ELHOC_Research: ¿Cuantos pasos deberían caminar las mujeres adultas mayores para reducir su riesgo de mortalidad prematura? Este nuevo…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @ProfDavidHunter: Association of Step Volume With Mortality in Older Women. As few as 4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower m…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @RV_Physio: 🚶♀️(+) de pas, (+) de vie🚶 👥 N = 16700 femmes, âge moyen 72 ans ⏱ Suivi de 4,3 ans ; 504 femmes décédées ❤️ 4400 pas/j…
¿Cuantos pasos deberían caminar las mujeres adultas mayores para reducir su riesgo de mortalidad prematura? Este nuevo estudio sugiere al menos 7000 pasos al día. https://t.co/Qv98twugO5 https://t.co/5fHtHovspo
RT @monkeyalien: 每天走7500步就足以续命了,再多益处不是很大。 (平均年龄72岁的老年女性,干预指标包括步数、行走强度、行走速度,最后发现能够显著降低全因死亡率的主要指标还是步数。日步数提升到7500步之前,全因死亡率是逐渐下降的;超过7500步后全因死亡率…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @doktora_ging: Easier for the knees! 4400 steps per day is enough! https://t.co/V0aTzmCYfa
¿Cuantos pasos deberían caminar las mujeres adultas mayores para reducir su riesgo de mortalidad prematura? Este nuevo estudio sugiere al menos 7000 pasos al dia.
RT @MirenBego: Caminar al menos 6000 pasos diarios parece una muy buena recomendación. https://t.co/eGzuT3tA6n
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/NCZ8KkN2Gw #steps #health HT @EricTopol
RT @chrishendel: Good piece here by @ConsumerReports @kevloria addressing I-Min Lee's latest study in @JAMAInternalMed https://t.co/2TBQwyl…
RT @NightShiftMD: Now you tell me! https://t.co/Y53V4Srnhn
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Love that someone did the science and found a more reasonable number: 7500 steps/day. Wonder what the number is for men however.
RT @venkmurthy: Interesting paper in @JAMAInternalMed showing relationship between mortality and step counts flattens out after about 7500…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
We don’t need 10,000 steps a day to stay alive anymore, and as far as I know, a glass of red wine still has health benefits! Oh happy day!