I’m glad I can wind it back a bit for winter! @mplatts @dralexcmurphy @drmatiasyudi @kaznegishi
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
Don't worry, 7500 steps/day is apparently enough @AbenaPhD
RT @FosteratBristol: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women JAMA Internal Medicine, active at any…
RT @venkmurthy: Interesting paper in @JAMAInternalMed showing relationship between mortality and step counts flattens out after about 7500…
RT @FosteratBristol: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women JAMA Internal Medicine, active at any…
RT @ProfDavidHunter: Association of Step Volume With Mortality in Older Women. As few as 4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower m…
RT @ProfDavidHunter: Association of Step Volume With Mortality in Older Women. As few as 4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower m…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Any activity is good for your health. #Health4All #HealthNews #healthcoach #في_الحركة_بركة
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @RV_Physio: 🚶♀️(+) de pas, (+) de vie🚶 👥 N = 16700 femmes, âge moyen 72 ans ⏱ Suivi de 4,3 ans ; 504 femmes décédées ❤️ 4400 pas/j…
每天需要走一万步这样的说法并没有依据,这个研究表明,对于老年女性而言,每天的行走的步数越多的确越健康,但是超过了7500步以后,就没有额外的好处了(当然也没有坏处)。
RT @centinel5051: Relación entre el número de pasos diarios y riesgo de mortalidad https://t.co/6dPYFb6Unh Más pasos asociado a menor riesg…
Good to know lower numbers of steps can still give health benefits....
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @marlabeauchamp: Interesting study that doesn’t support the popular (but not evidence-based) 10,000 steps a day recommendation https://t…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
RT @exerciseworks: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women Conclusions and Relevance Among older…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
RT @Office_j: 【たくさん 歩く/歩ける 人は長生き?/ JAMA IM】 米国、医療従事女性16741名、万歩計7日装着後、平均4.3年観察:1日歩数中央値最低四分位群に比べ、その他の群ではいずれも、死亡リスクが有意に低。7500歩/日まで用量依存性。 htt…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @venkmurthy: Interesting paper in @JAMAInternalMed showing relationship between mortality and step counts flattens out after about 7500…
RT @RV_Physio: 🚶♀️(+) de pas, (+) de vie🚶 👥 N = 16700 femmes, âge moyen 72 ans ⏱ Suivi de 4,3 ans ; 504 femmes décédées ❤️ 4400 pas/j…
RT @venkmurthy: Interesting paper in @JAMAInternalMed showing relationship between mortality and step counts flattens out after about 7500…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @exerciseworks: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women Conclusions and Relevance Among older…
You might not need to take #10000steps a day: "#Older women who took 4,400 steps p/day had lower mortality than those taking 2,700; risk of death continued to decrease with more #steps up to 7,500 steps per day before levelling off." https://t.co/47GumlJj
RT @venkmurthy: Interesting paper in @JAMAInternalMed showing relationship between mortality and step counts flattens out after about 7500…
RT @venkmurthy: Interesting paper in @JAMAInternalMed showing relationship between mortality and step counts flattens out after about 7500…
RT @AMP_Physio: More steps, more life 🚶♀️ 👥 n = 16,700 women, mean age 72 ⏱ follow-up of 4.3 years; 504 women died. ❤️ 4400 steps/d =…
RT @exerciseworks: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women Conclusions and Relevance Among older…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @exerciseworks: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women Conclusions and Relevance Among older…
RT @marlabeauchamp: Interesting study that doesn’t support the popular (but not evidence-based) 10,000 steps a day recommendation https://t…
RT @FosteratBristol: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women JAMA Internal Medicine, active at any…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
https://t.co/NYW7IsS40s Contrary to beliefs that 10,000 steps/day are needed for health benefits, researchers found that as few as approximately 4400 steps/day were significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700 steps/day,
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @tkishi_cardiol: まさに #ヒポクラテス 先生の名言 「歩くことは人間にとって最良の薬である」 ですね! 実験医学「運動って何だ?」に、運動と #高血圧 について、自分の基礎研究の展望も含めて書きました。 https://t.co/Xe9kfe4Md…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @DrSepah: At @omadahealth, I instituted the 7,500 steps/day recommendation, based on the research literature and consulting with experts…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/7jOCitCMmi
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
RT @ma_hamer: The 10,000 step/day guideline was not so far off the mark #PhysicalActivity #health https://t.co/nZue2WYWXo
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @timspector: 10000 steps is just another myth - https://t.co/cNcLHsCgfY
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @MirenBego: Caminar al menos 6000 pasos diarios parece una muy buena recomendación. https://t.co/eGzuT3tA6n
RT @monkeyalien: 每天走7500步就足以续命了,再多益处不是很大。 (平均年龄72岁的老年女性,干预指标包括步数、行走强度、行走速度,最后发现能够显著降低全因死亡率的主要指标还是步数。日步数提升到7500步之前,全因死亡率是逐渐下降的;超过7500步后全因死亡率…
Puh! Mindre stressad över att stegmätaren sällan visar 10.000
10000 steps is just another myth -
RT @venkmurthy: Interesting paper in @JAMAInternalMed showing relationship between mortality and step counts flattens out after about 7500…
RT @MirenBego: Caminar al menos 6000 pasos diarios parece una muy buena recomendación. https://t.co/eGzuT3tA6n
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @ma_hamer: The 10,000 step/day guideline was not so far off the mark #PhysicalActivity #health https://t.co/nZue2WYWXo
More steps/day is associated with lower mortality (up to 7500 steps/day) in older women: https://t.co/sVtVhQPfZB
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @FosteratBristol: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women JAMA Internal Medicine, active at any…
RT @centinel5051: Relación entre el número de pasos diarios y riesgo de mortalidad https://t.co/6dPYFb6Unh Más pasos asociado a menor riesg…
RT @DrDavidKatz: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/puTCYO5kfA via @JAMAInternal…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @MirenBego: Caminar al menos 6000 pasos diarios parece una muy buena recomendación. https://t.co/eGzuT3tA6n
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @AMP_Physio: More steps, more life 🚶♀️ 👥 n = 16,700 women, mean age 72 ⏱ follow-up of 4.3 years; 504 women died. ❤️ 4400 steps/d =…
RT @centinel5051: Relación entre el número de pasos diarios y riesgo de mortalidad https://t.co/6dPYFb6Unh Más pasos asociado a menor riesg…
RT @FosteratBristol: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women JAMA Internal Medicine, active at any…
RT @PokrajacAna: Evidence that #exercise prolongs life! #mortality @ABCDiab @davidpilling @sball_endo @kamleshkhunti @miketrenell @skysteph…
RT @exerciseworks: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women Conclusions and Relevance Among older…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
🚶♀️(+) de pas, (+) de vie🚶 👥 N = 16700 femmes, âge moyen 72 ans ⏱ Suivi de 4,3 ans ; 504 femmes décédées ❤️ 4400 pas/j = mortalité plus faible par rapport aux femmes les (-) actives à 2700 pas/j 🎯 7000 pas/j peut suffire pour atteindre le taux reco'
RT @MirenBego: Caminar al menos 6000 pasos diarios parece una muy buena recomendación. https://t.co/eGzuT3tA6n
RT @MehmetE_Krkmz: Herkes için 10000 adım/gün: ?? Bu çalışma (>16000 kadın, ort. 72 y) egzersize bağlı mortalite yararının 4400 adımda baş…
🌟 Buzzing in the Belgian Healthcare Community 🌟 📰 Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/hfai2oj5oi Via @hartog_bert
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…