↓ Skip to main content

Food Allergens

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Food Allergens'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Overview of the Commonly Used Methods for Food Allergens
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Allergen Extraction and Purification from Natural Products: Main Chromatographic Techniques
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Recombinant Allergen Production in E. coli
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Recombinant Allergens Production in Yeast
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 2D-Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting in Food Allergy
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Identification by Mass Spectrometry
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detection of Food Allergens by Taqman Real-Time PCR Methodology
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Detection of Food Allergens by Phage-Displayed Produced Antibodies
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Protein Microarray-Based IgE Immunoassay for Allergy Diagnosis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Basophil Degranulation Assay
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Use of Humanized RS-ATL8 Reporter System for Detection of Allergen-Specific IgE Sensitization in Human Food Allergy
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Assessment of IgE Reactivity of β-Casein by Western Blotting After Digestion with Simulated Gastric Fluid
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 IgE Epitope Mapping Using Peptide Microarray Immunoassay
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 T-Cell Proliferation Assay: Determination of Immunodominant T-Cell Epitopes of Food Allergens
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Tetramer-Guided Epitope Mapping: A Rapid Approach to Identify HLA-Restricted T-Cell Epitopes from Composite Allergens
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 T-Cell Epitope Prediction
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 An Overview of Bioinformatics Tools and Resources in Allergy
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 The Use of a Semi-Automated System to Measure Mouse Natural Killer T (NKT) Cell Activation by Lipid-Loaded Dendritic Cells
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Recent Advances in the Detection of Allergens in Foods
Attention for Chapter 7: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Chapter number 7
Book title
Food Allergens
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6925-8_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6923-4, 978-1-4939-6925-8
Authors

George N. Konstantinou, Konstantinou, George N.

Editors

Jing Lin, Marcos Alcocer

Abstract

Food allergy is a public health concern especially after recognizing its constantly increased prevalence and severity. Despite careful reading of food ingredient statements, food allergic individuals may experience reactions caused by "hidden", "masked", or "contaminated" proteins that are known major allergens. Many techniques have been developed to detect even small traces of food allergens, for clinical or laboratory purposes. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is one of the best validated and most routinely used immunoassay in allergy research, in allergy diagnosis in allergy-related quality control in various industries. Although as a technique it has been implemented for the last 45 years, the evolution in biochemistry allowed the development of ultrasensitive ELISA variations that are capable of measuring quantities in the scale of picograms, rendering ELISA attractive, robust, and very famous.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 422 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 97 23%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Researcher 21 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 3%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 170 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 8%
Chemistry 20 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 4%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 186 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,987
of 14,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,212
of 337,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#112
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.