↓ Skip to main content

Heterologous Protein Production in CHO Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heterologous Protein Production in CHO Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Strategies and Considerations for Improving Expression of “Difficult to Express” Proteins in CHO Cells
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Glycoengineering of CHO Cells to Improve Product Quality
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Large-Scale Transient Transfection of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells in Suspension
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Cloning of Single-Chain Antibody Variants by Overlap-Extension PCR for Evaluation of Antibody Expression in Transient Gene Expression
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Anti-Apoptosis Engineering for Improved Protein Production from CHO Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Conditional Knockdown of Endogenous MicroRNAs in CHO Cells Using TET-ON-SanDI Sponge Vectors
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing to Improve Recombinant Protein Production in CHO Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Improved CHO Cell Line Stability and Recombinant Protein Expression During Long-Term Culture
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Selection of High-Producing Clones Using FACS for CHO Cell Line Development
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The ‘Omics Revolution in CHO Biology: Roadmap to Improved CHO Productivity
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Bioinformatics Pipeline for the Identification of CHO Cell Differential Gene Expression from RNA-Seq Data
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) for Improved Proteome Analysis of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Phosphopeptide Enrichment and LC-MS/MS Analysis to Study the Phosphoproteome of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Engineer Medium and Feed for Modulating N-Glycosylation of Recombinant Protein Production in CHO Cell Culture
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Glycosylation Analysis of Therapeutic Glycoproteins Produced in CHO Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Characterization of Host Cell Proteins (HCPs) in CHO Cell Bioprocesses
Attention for Chapter 10: The ‘Omics Revolution in CHO Biology: Roadmap to Improved CHO Productivity
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The ‘Omics Revolution in CHO Biology: Roadmap to Improved CHO Productivity
Chapter number 10
Book title
Heterologous Protein Production in CHO Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6972-2_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6971-5, 978-1-4939-6972-2
Authors

Hussain Dahodwala, Susan T. Sharfstein, Dahodwala, Hussain, Sharfstein, Susan T.

Editors

Paula Meleady

Abstract

Increased understanding of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell physiology has been ushered in upon availability of the parental CHO-K1 cell line genome. Free and openly accessible sequence information has complemented transcriptomic and proteomic studies. The previous decade has also seen an increase in sensitivity and accuracy of proteomic methods due to technology development. In this genomic era, high-throughput screening methods, sophisticated informatic tools, and models continually drive major innovations in cell line development and process engineering. This review describes the various achievements in 'omics techniques and their application to improve recombinant protein expression from CHO cell lines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 37%
Chemical Engineering 6 17%
Chemistry 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,211,765
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#710
of 13,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,429
of 422,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#88
of 1,076 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,076 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.