↓ Skip to main content

X-Chromosome Inactivation

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'X-Chromosome Inactivation'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Screening for Factors Involved in X Chromosome Inactivation Using Haploid ESCs
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Unbiased Genetic Screen to Identify Factors Involved in X-Chromosome Inactivation Using a Pooled Bar-Coded shRNA Library
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 ChIRP-MS: RNA-Directed Proteomic Discovery
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Manipulation of Xist Imprinting in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Mice: Basic Protocol and Its Modification for Correcting X Chromosome Inactivation Status
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Live Imaging of Xist RNA
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Live Imaging of X-Chromosome Inactivation and Reactivation Kinetics
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Visualizing the Dynamics of Inactive X Chromosomes in Living Cells Using Antibody-Based Fluorescent Probes
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Visualization of Hidden Epitopes at the Inactive X Chromosome
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Chromosome Spread Analyses of Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Simultaneous RNA–DNA FISH in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Combined Immunofluorescence, RNA FISH, and DNA FISH in Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 RNA-FISH and Immunofluorescence of Mouse Preimplantation and Postimplantation Embryos
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Experimental Analysis of Imprinted Mouse X-Chromosome Inactivation
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 X-Chromosome Inactivation and Escape from X Inactivation in Mouse
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Practical Analysis of Hi-C Data: Generating A/B Compartment Profiles
Attention for Chapter 14: Experimental Analysis of Imprinted Mouse X-Chromosome Inactivation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Experimental Analysis of Imprinted Mouse X-Chromosome Inactivation
Chapter number 14
Book title
X-Chromosome Inactivation
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8766-5_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8765-8, 978-1-4939-8766-5
Authors

Marissa Cloutier, Clair Harris, Srimonta Gayen, Emily Maclary, Sundeep Kalantry, Cloutier, Marissa, Harris, Clair, Gayen, Srimonta, Maclary, Emily, Kalantry, Sundeep

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation is a dosage compensation mechanism that equalizes X-linked gene expression between male and female mammals through the transcriptional silencing of most genes on one of the two X-chromosomes in females. With a few key exceptions, once the X-chromosome is inactivated replicated copies of that X-chromosome are maintained as inactive in all descendant cells. X-inactivation is therefore a paradigm of epigenetic inheritance. Imprinted X-inactivation is a specialized form of X-inactivation that results in the silencing of the paternally derived X-chromosome. Due to its parent-of-origin-specific pattern of inactivation, imprinted X-inactivation is a model of mitotic as well as meiotic, i.e., transgenerational, epigenetic inheritance. All cells of the early mouse embryo undergo imprinted X-inactivation, a pattern that is subsequently maintained in extraembryonic cell types in vivo and in vitro. Here, we describe both high- and low-throughput approaches to interrogate imprinted X-inactivation in the mouse embryo as well in cultured extraembryonic stem cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,152,619
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,838
of 13,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,634
of 338,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#91
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.