RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @sarahkendrew: NEJM editorial posits that reusing others' data for new science makes you a "research parasite" 😕 https://t.co/7g2vU9NmYE…
@zenrhino that would be great, but no, editorial in @NEJM https://t.co/sg7VEOAjW1
So scientists reanalysing published data are #researchparasites ? Reproducible science needs more, not less. https://t.co/fhk7uShCZb @NEJM
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @npch: Parasites play an important role in ecosystems. The scientific world would be worse off without #researchparasites https://t.co/K…
"[research parasites] even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited". Whaat? https://t.co/RtxxUY6NhZ
RT @JonathanGoeke: This would actually make for good satire. Poe's Law, right, NEJM? https://t.co/GUGMGlrNEV #researchparasites
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JohnBorghi: Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @MMMarksman: If you use others data then you're a "parasite". Wow, can't even fathom how this stinker got to see the light of day https:…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
This is reality. Very few researchers like sharing their data. It's like property rights, de facto https://t.co/28X8ZF0t8O
Not sure what is going on at @NEJM. Once again on the wrong side of history https://t.co/pZe5mCNVUO #opendata #openscience
Arrogansen i veckans NEJM-ledare... https://t.co/45oCKMd4ij
RT @jonathancairns: Catching up on @NEJM "research parasites" stuff; will charitably describe it as "misguided"... #IAmAResearchParasite ht…
RT @c_althaus: .@NEJM thinks disproving research findings by reanalyzing original data is wrong and calls those who do “parasites” https://…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @Protohedgehog: So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAm…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
"use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited" That's a GOOD point of #opendata @NEJM https://t.co/ymaNgpQiWB
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @nils_gehlenborg: This @NEJM editorial on #datasharing & #researchparasites … Wow! Incredibly shortsighted. https://t.co/nHQjfvPE4g
RT @Tioliah: So nearly everyone in bioinformatics is a parasite? What a ridiculous article from @NEJM https://t.co/wAB8jwASpp #IAmAResear…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @CellTypist: @NEJM calls users of publically available datasets #reserachparasites https://t.co/bjfs53e68K; parasites welcome at https:/…
RT @omgItsEnRIz: https://t.co/IRn6Ojzfl4 Dear authors of this piece of crap: Do you even science? #IAmAResearchParasite
#researchparasites editorial: Collaboration is sexy; transparency & replication are not. Reproducibility loses https://t.co/AUzWPdIYpb
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @amalec: “or even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horrors. https://t.co/pX1DWwLLfR
RT @amalec: “or even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horrors. https://t.co/pX1DWwLLfR
RT @brembs: If you're afraid that someone might actually read, use and test your research: don't do/publish research. https://t.co/Jux6HKm8…
RT @Protohedgehog: So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAm…
Share data!🔬RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial aren’t fit to run a journal: https://t.co/N154B24d8k Disgraceful, attitude.
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
#researchParasites - how can anyone agree with that?? https://t.co/ubmW6zt333
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @richarddmorey: The idea of #researchparasites - that analyzing reported data is "parasitic" is small minded https://t.co/mye2SSKety htt…
RT @Protohedgehog: So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAm…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @dannykay68: EXTRAORDINARY: NEJM editorial describing those who publish work using open research data as 'parasites' https://t.co/mbElYH…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @chrisdc77: How lame. @NEJM attempts to sow fear, uncertainty & doubt into #opendata by calling secondary data users 'parasites' https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
Editorialists editorialise about their inability to make details of their study clear https://t.co/GhDhePasVe #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @JohnBorghi: Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @MMMarksman: If you use others data then you're a "parasite". Wow, can't even fathom how this stinker got to see the light of day https:…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @Tioliah: So nearly everyone in bioinformatics is a parasite? What a ridiculous article from @NEJM https://t.co/wAB8jwASpp #IAmAResear…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
So nearly everyone in bioinformatics is a parasite? What a ridiculous article from @NEJM https://t.co/wAB8jwASpp #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @chrisdc77: How lame. @NEJM attempts to sow fear, uncertainty & doubt into #opendata by calling secondary data users 'parasites' https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
This is the most corrupt, ego-boosting whining you will ever see in an academic journal. Read! #researchparasites https://t.co/0w1xibHicl
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
This would actually make for good satire. Poe's Law, right, NEJM? https://t.co/GUGMGlrNEV #researchparasites
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @brembs: Retraction-record @nejm finds "original investigators" are infallible #researchparasites https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 https://t.co/K…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…