RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Enjoying #researchparasite - nice that data sharing is getting defended, but sad this article got published in 2016 https://t.co/Hls2jvEz8I
RT @grapealope: Fascinating discussion of data sharing, science, #opendata, and #researchparasites, following this NEJM article: https://t.…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
Lots of criticism of recent NEJM editorial (https://t.co/TC4i99t7gN) on clinical trial data use, e.g.: https://t.co/hQsmJK9ehq
RT @silviaberciano: Trying to replicate published findings or test alternative hypotheses? Careful, you may be a #ResearchParasite! https:…
Fascinating discussion of data sharing, science, #opendata, and #researchparasites, following this NEJM article: https://t.co/6Hw68pcsju
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/4OMEYPuSEP aka "good science reinforces existing power structures" https://t.co/WNXURZVENu
Ludicrous concerns about #datasharing #opendata #openscience in @NEJM editorial https://t.co/XmoSLDAHK2 https://t.co/tBEC7xqTCL
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @KordingLab: The New England Journal of Medicine would call many physicists "research parasites" - https://t.co/1RAnwVJhGj - data analys…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @silviaberciano: Trying to replicate published findings or test alternative hypotheses? Careful, you may be a #ResearchParasite! https:…
RT @elarturito: Embarrassing! What about reproducibility? Are you afraid ? #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/Nt9TjwAIyw
Data sharing concerns #openscience #avointiede https://t.co/JgBFYiTIpm
RT @AnilMakam: Not sure what is going on at @NEJM. Once again on the wrong side of history https://t.co/pZe5mCNVUO #opendata #openscience
Ver en un tweet "research", "parasite" y @NEJM juntos Comprobar que no es lo que tú piensas https://t.co/V04As1xAw2 https://t.co/Vbm4pMxZpH
RT @JohnBorghi: Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @brembs: Is @nejm afraid #researchparasites will increase their industry-leading # of retractions? https://t.co/UQjvoYEsD5 https://t.co/…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @LJVillanuevaSci: Wow, @NEJM refers to scientists advocating for open science as "research parasites" https://t.co/Ac4Jgh0cnZ The arroga…
RT @ljvillanueva: Wow, @NEJM refers to scientists advocating for open science as "research parasites" https://t.co/rVvnI3evWr The arrogance…
RT @brembs: If you're afraid that someone might actually read, use and test your research: don't do/publish research. https://t.co/Jux6HKm8…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
@NEJM proves that clever people can write the stupidest stuff with this absurd editorial. https://t.co/uxF71MzldA
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
Wow, @NEJM refers to scientists advocating for open science as "research parasites" https://t.co/Ac4Jgh0cnZ The arrogance is strong
Does "Data Sharing" broadside mean no more NHANES data for @NEJM? https://t.co/xwnbDJdtdo #researchparasites
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JohnBorghi: Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://…
Embarrassing! What about reproducibility? Are you afraid ? #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/Nt9TjwAIyw
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
Wow. Editorial in @NEJM is actually calling folks using published/shared data of others "research parasites". https://t.co/c4xinxhp1E
RT @FrontiersIn: Controversial @NEJM editorial. Are researchers who reuse data without cooperating w/ original authors "parasites"? https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
Silly me...I thought ideas were free, even those "obvious extensions of reported work" https://t.co/zFUoamHTZT #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @silviaberciano: Trying to replicate published findings or test alternative hypotheses? Careful, you may be a #ResearchParasite! https:…
The New England Journal of Medicine would call many physicists "research parasites" - https://t.co/1RAnwVJhGj - data analysis = theft
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @brembs: If you're afraid that someone might actually read, use and test your research: don't do/publish research. https://t.co/Jux6HKm8…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @JohnBorghi: Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://…
@holy_kau Different field, but troubling editorial- should workers be able to choose who can work with their data? https://t.co/7IKjpdITvy
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Trying to replicate published findings or test alternative hypotheses? Careful, you may be a #ResearchParasite! https://t.co/VIuwPo6V5D
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @chrisdc77: How lame. @NEJM attempts to sow fear, uncertainty & doubt into #opendata by calling secondary data users 'parasites' https:/…
RT @brembs: Is @nejm afraid #researchparasites will increase their industry-leading # of retractions? https://t.co/UQjvoYEsD5 https://t.co/…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @KrisLaukens: So scientists reanalysing published data are #researchparasites ? Reproducible science needs more, not less. https://t.co/…
Data Sharing — @NEJM Hard to imagine a less well informed discussion of sharing. #AgingData #IAmAResearchParasite. https://t.co/iNkIQxqokO
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
I think @adamcchang would agree with me that #IAmAResearchParasite #openscience https://t.co/H9Pvbl91hT
And interesting in light of NEJM's latest on data sharing https://t.co/x4AvcMy7sM https://t.co/Bgb7LBee13
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @chrisdc77: How lame. @NEJM attempts to sow fear, uncertainty & doubt into #opendata by calling secondary data users 'parasites' https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @KrisLaukens: So scientists reanalysing published data are #researchparasites ? Reproducible science needs more, not less. https://t.co/…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
@NEJM drag your eds into the 20th century. Bow/scrape or be a "parasite"? Protectionism is the road to irrelevance. https://t.co/CLYx7437dD
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
Weirdly paranoid comment now a rallying cry for data sharing #researchparasites https://t.co/k4mt1ZsqRb https://t.co/LGEd3LH4u5
So, worst science editorial of the month, this at Cladistics, https://t.co/ILT55doRTE or this at NEJM: https://t.co/YmP9vexJoY
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @schneiderleonid: #IAmAResearchParasite @NEJM claims in editorial shared data leads to it being stolen by research parasites. No joke ht…
RT @adamgurri: Data sharing is bad, b/c people might use the data to disprove the data gatherer's conclusions! https://t.co/PB6oRjr0Qp via …
Interesting Editorial on Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/5IeDHllqLs
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @brembs: Retraction-record @nejm finds "original investigators" are infallible #researchparasites https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 https://t.co/K…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…