↓ Skip to main content

Unconventional Protein Secretion

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Unconventional Protein Secretion'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 ER to Golgi-Dependent Protein Secretion: The Conventional Pathway
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Chemical Secretory Pathway Modulation in Plant Protoplasts
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 From Cytosol to the Apoplast: The Hygromycin Phosphotransferase (HYGR) Model in Arabidopsis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Quantification of a Non-conventional Protein Secretion: The Low-Molecular-Weight FGF-2 Example
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Human Primary Keratinocytes as a Tool for the Analysis of Caspase-1-Dependent Unconventional Protein Secretion
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Reporter System to Study Unconventional Secretion of Proteins Avoiding N-Glycosylation in Ustilago maydis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Stress-Inducible Protein 1 (STI1): Extracellular Vesicle Analysis and Quantification
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Characterization of the Unconventional Secretion of the Ebola Matrix Protein VP40
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Role and Characterization of Synuclein-γ Unconventional Protein Secretion in Cancer Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Unconventional Protein Secretion
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Isolation of Exosome-Like Vesicles from Plants by Ultracentrifugation on Sucrose/Deuterium Oxide (D2O) Density Cushions
Attention for Chapter 13: Unconventional Protein Secretion
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Unconventional Protein Secretion
Chapter number 13
Book title
Unconventional Protein Secretion
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3804-9_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3802-5, 978-1-4939-3804-9
Authors

MacLean, Lorna, Price, Helen, O'Toole, Peter, Lorna MacLean, Helen Price, Peter O’Toole

Editors

Andrea Pompa, Francesca De Marchis

Abstract

Leishmania major is a human-infective protozoan parasite transmitted by the bite of the female phlebotomine sand fly. The L. major hydrophilic acylated surface protein B (HASPB) is only expressed in infective parasite stages suggesting a role in parasite virulence. HASPB is a "nonclassically" secreted protein that lacks a conventional signal peptide, reaching the cell surface by an alternative route to the classical ER-Golgi pathway. Instead HASPB trafficking to and exposure on the parasite plasma membrane requires dual N-terminal acylation. Here, we use live cell imaging methods to further explore this pathway allowing visualization of key events in real time at the individual cell level. These methods include live cell imaging using fluorescent reporters to determine the subcellular localization of wild type and acylation site mutation HASPB18-GFP fusion proteins, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to analyze the dynamics of HASPB in live cells, and live antibody staining to detect surface exposure of HASPB by confocal microscopy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#12,905,538
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,278
of 13,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,283
of 393,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#307
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.