Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living

RT @tasmedes: Incredible! Intelligent Design creationism gets past PLoS One referees & is published: https://t.co/btgvc80nSx (see final lin…

RT @tommyhigham: #PLOSONE paper says hands are "Proper design of the Creator". #neversubmittinganotherpaperthereEVER https://t.co/kg2XENgT5Z

Creationism in @PLOSONE. Maybe we shouldn't be publishing real science there any more. https://t.co/hUyZ0tsWlr

In PLoS ONE a paper mentioning few time the 'creator'. Good job for losing entirely your credibility. https://t.co/w1rBZDYgZ2

So did @PLOS just recently turn into a joke, or was it designed that way all along by the CREATOR? https://t.co/2pxB71qFzd

RT @arambaut: I wonder how many PLoS One Editors will resign? https://t.co/vGj6Dgt3XL

@John_Kavanagh, see this yet? The 'scientific' evedence that a hand had to have been made by a creator. https://t.co/giSbMXwnrb @PLOSONE

Incredible! Intelligent Design creationism gets past PLoS One referees & is published: https://t.co/btgvc80nSx (see final lines discussion)

I wonder how many PLoS One Editors will resign? https://t.co/vGj6Dgt3XL

How did this get through review? @PLOSONE paper credits "the Creator" for human hand coordination... https://t.co/JnPIDHz8lp

#PLOSONE editor asleep at the wheel? References to "Creator" a bit light in the supporting evidence department ... https://t.co/4AtlTVNCyQ

In PLoS ONE: "... the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" | https://t.co/OHarIPPO1q

RT @AchilleasK: There's something wrong with peer review if biomechanics papers can claim “hands are proper design of the Creator” https://…

Still, some of the comments on the Plos One 'intelligent design' article are a little over-the-top https://t.co/LxSqVupnWE

The shit storm following this is going to be entertaining Study suggests "hands are the proper design of the creator"https://t.co/Mh26hgm8G7

Article published in Plos One arguing intelligent design of the human hand. Someone dropped the ball here. https://t.co/B3VVDG6nRl

@RetractionWatch and the response from PLOS ONE - https://t.co/7JyH5DnoIl Wonder if it was a test of their editorial system :)

@Neuro_Skeptic Amazing comment on the paper in question - https://t.co/gEtxgiXRJL and it is up for retraction

RT @NPRougier: "...is the proper design by the Creator to perform..." @PLOS Seriously ? https://t.co/FhfnToHU7Q

RT @HochTwit: The Creator appears to have achieved the proper design FOLLOWING evolution @PLOSONE https://t.co/7Bhdr9rfa7 https://t.co/ZDRI…

RT @EMARIANOMD: So this happened... @PLOSONE published #research abstract makes reference to "the Creator" https://t.co/szb6KMqDYk https://…

RT @lucaborger: Less quantity & speed, proper Editors & #peerreview (pre & post) = less #handofgod? Lessons from @PLOSONE debacle. https://…

RT @CyanistesNord: #PLOSONE publish paper inferring #intelligentdesign. Inexcusable and mind-boggling how this got through #peerreview htt…

Oh dear. I have to admit I haven't read the whole paper, the abstract was enough to make my face hit the desk! https://t.co/tHoppNztDF

Intelligent design in @PLOSONE ... oops. https://t.co/oHNVv4iQNZ

Less quantity & speed, proper Editors & #peerreview (pre & post) = less #handofgod? Lessons from @PLOSONE debacle. https://t.co/jOTcau3xF2

RT @AchilleasK: There's something wrong with peer review if biomechanics papers can claim “hands are proper design of the Creator” https://…

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI

RT @BenjPetre: Hey #PLOSONE, is this a joke? Who is 'the Creator' in this article? https://t.co/v7QJuZs8EE #OMG @TheTweetOfGod

RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…

https://t.co/nVPEOwJ1KE PLOS ONE paper endorses intelligent design explanation of the hand... Shocking oversight in peer review process

RT @nfeau: "Proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/aoiwCS8QdC WTH!!! Seriously @PLOSONE from @BenjPetre

RT @TetZoo: Storm erupts over sloppy #PLOS paper on human hand which cites design by creator, oh dear... look at reader comments https://t.…

RT @NPRougier: "...is the proper design by the Creator to perform..." @PLOS Seriously ? https://t.co/FhfnToHU7Q

RT @WvSchaik: On the @PLOSONE paper discussing the 'intelligent design by the Creator' of the hand. https://t.co/Bpxxslry8N https://t.co/fj…

RT @tommyhigham: #PLOSONE paper says hands are "Proper design of the Creator". #neversubmittinganotherpaperthereEVER https://t.co/kg2XENgT5Z

MinosOne ... https://t.co/ApSPmyfnSC

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

The Creator conquers @PLOSONE. Shame on you! Does a paper like that get you more money? https://t.co/BlZh17cbyK

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

#Creationism finds it way into a @PLOSONE paper.. An ex. of #peerreview failure? #handofgod https://t.co/ehnr8FORdj https://t.co/ZwhBNEZDqz

#PlosOne fail - good for a laugh and a cringe at the future of "peer-review" https://t.co/JjqggEmy2b #acwri #science #peerreview

RT @WvSchaik: Some of the comments on the intelligent design paper in @PLOSONE are comedy gold: https://t.co/0yjXZM5qI5

Creationist article published in @PLOSONE? https://t.co/t5mmgU4IqU This is embarrassing.

RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…

"...confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator for dexterous performance.." https://t.co/MQj8csHulM

RT @PLOSONE: PLOS ONE editors apologize that language wasn't addressed pre-publication. We're looking into concerns w/ priority. https://t.…

du créationnisme dans une publi...en 2016 #handofgod on n'a pas le cul sorti des ronces!! https://t.co/mdlGLmzKBL

an interesting challenge for @PLOSONE - impressive dataset on hand kinematics but overtly religious motivation https://t.co/MQj8csHulM

"Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." https://t.co/MQj8csHulM

"...connective architecture between muscles and articulations is the proper design by the Creator... " https://t.co/MQj8csHulM

Who is this mysterious Creator they are talking about? Is it Charles Darwin? @PLOSONE https://t.co/ShJRA1rNy1

The article at the centre of the "oopsie": https://t.co/FO42xzZ8Bz

RT @tncoulson: Creationists are giving science the finger in the #HandOfGod paper. https://t.co/Qo7PunSca0 @PLOSONE A disgraceful hand job.

@PLOSONE is a laughingstock after CREATIONISM sneaked in https://t.co/3uDOqAe2ik @CienciaxPueblo @JartoPanchu @moncadista @MerluzaFresca

RT @BobOHara: .@jomcinerney @scholarlykitchn I rather like ArthurDent's comment: https://t.co/zw57Vg8Evl

#PLOSONE:Wow, Using Intelligent design creationism in a science journal https://t.co/j4WNC7iGnO . How did this even get through?

Boooh ! How can I contact this Creator lab to reproduce the experiment ? Plos One, do something ! https://t.co/D04PE5ucCW

Should really have offered authorship for exceptional study design https://t.co/4XmuQmCzqq would have hella-good bibliometrics! #handofgod

"Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." https://t.co/1rvtPXtNnt There goes PLOS One's credibility.

RT @CyanistesNord: #PLOSONE publish paper inferring #intelligentdesign. Inexcusable and mind-boggling how this got through #peerreview htt…

A #PLOSONE article: #God designed hands to perform a multitude of daily tasks in a comfortable way. #LOL https://t.co/zSGajw26N5

RT @joaconavajas: @PLOSONE this is the one and only #handofgod https://t.co/2sZWAmOWkp https://t.co/k5DQUwzd8L

👎 #PLOSONE @TheTweetOfGod https://t.co/cgT6iSFHTM

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI

Creationists are giving science the finger in the #HandOfGod paper. https://t.co/Qo7PunSca0 @PLOSONE A disgraceful hand job.

#PLOSONE publish paper inferring #intelligentdesign. Inexcusable and mind-boggling how this got through #peerreview https://t.co/AIqFmmAqie

RT @deray28: What a fail of the peer-review process #PLOSONE #science #creatorgate https://t.co/hAAHO2coSZ

What a fail of the peer-review process #PLOSONE #science #creatorgate https://t.co/hAAHO2coSZ

RT @PLOSONE: PLOS ONE editors apologize that language wasn't addressed pre-publication. We're looking into concerns w/ priority. https://t.…

RT @JSherlock92: Between @real_peerreview and @PLOSONE publishing intelligent design papers, my faith in science is rapidly dwindling https…

RT @haewoon: PLOSONE이라는 잘나가던 저널이 "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks"라는 표현이 있는 논문을 개제하고 탈탈 털리고있음 https://t.…

RT @TetZoo: Storm erupts over sloppy #PLOS paper on human hand which cites design by creator, oh dear... look at reader comments https://t.…

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI

RT @PLOSONE: PLOS ONE editors apologize that language wasn't addressed pre-publication. We're looking into concerns w/ priority. https://t.…

Storm erupts over sloppy #PLOS paper on human hand which cites design by creator, oh dear... look at reader comments https://t.co/d1ZQ31WZRJ

Thank God for our hands! Article in @PLOSONE claims that we have 'the Creator' to thank for hand coordination... https://t.co/L5wzLs2Jp1

@RichardDawkins @PLOSONE Please, read abstract til the end. Who were the reviewers? Incredible https://t.co/JDyYghAy5y

Shoking! #PLOSONE starts publishing intelligent design papers. https://t.co/H27lmwZtCl #evolution

What??? #PLOSONE published a paper with #creationist comments? https://t.co/E4kMNjtMIT

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI

RT @cynocephale: Who doesn't like the fresh smell of #creationism in #science journals? https://t.co/8DLfXdkRXu #PLOSONE #evolution https:/…

RT @PLOSONE: PLOS ONE editors apologize that language wasn't addressed pre-publication. We're looking into concerns w/ priority. https://t.…

RT @haewoon: PLOSONE이라는 잘나가던 저널이 "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks"라는 표현이 있는 논문을 개제하고 탈탈 털리고있음 https://t.…

RT @HochTwit: The Creator appears to have achieved the proper design FOLLOWING evolution @PLOSONE https://t.co/7Bhdr9rfa7 https://t.co/ZDRI…

RT @haewoon: PLOSONE이라는 잘나가던 저널이 "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks"라는 표현이 있는 논문을 개제하고 탈탈 털리고있음 https://t.…

RT @haewoon: PLOSONE이라는 잘나가던 저널이 "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks"라는 표현이 있는 논문을 개제하고 탈탈 털리고있음 https://t.…

PloS1 publishes paper with creationist comments. You can read other researchers comments on the paper here:... https://t.co/YGXc1z3klx

RT @AchilleasK: There's something wrong with peer review if biomechanics papers can claim “hands are proper design of the Creator” https://…

RT @PLOSONE: PLOS ONE editors apologize that language wasn't addressed pre-publication. We're looking into concerns w/ priority. https://t.…

PLOSONE이라는 잘나가던 저널이 "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks"라는 표현이 있는 논문을 개제하고 탈탈 털리고있음 https://t.co/JNSX97UocE

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI

There's something wrong with peer review if biomechanics papers can claim “hands are proper design of the Creator” https://t.co/ukWpgAJ3DB

RT @cynocephale: Who doesn't like the fresh smell of #creationism in #science journals? https://t.co/8DLfXdkRXu #PLOSONE #evolution https:/…

Link to the article of shame. #PLOSONE #Creationism https://t.co/oDxrq0Q1y8

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI

RT @LeeDugatkin: PLoS One ROYALLY SCREWS UP! Publishes paper that touts "proper design by the Creator". Creator, cap C, used 3 times!https:…

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI

RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI