RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
@gertyz @plosone https://t.co/tnXmbvMU8a Somebody debunked the theory already, apparently.
RT @uadlup: Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @Protohedgehog: 'Biomechanical features of hands are the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/0zDSysFwAm I'm sorry, I thought this…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…
RT @Lufpa: What to think about the reviewers and editor who allowed: "...indicates...is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/J…
"Our study can confirm..that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" What the s**t @PLOSONE https://t.co/immQ2nBVDE
Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/p2aIEl1iBY
RT @BobOHara: .@jomcinerney @scholarlykitchn I rather like ArthurDent's comment: https://t.co/zw57Vg8Evl
THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8YSC7AbwgE
RT @CienciaxPueblo: Creacionismo y #OpenAccess se dan la mano en PLOS ONE https://t.co/0FfyEPtx3o cc @crendueles @medicocritico @jdelacueva…
RT @Lignedescience: C'est reparti: créationnisme dans PLOS "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." htt…
RT @lraffens: Seriously? Peer reviewed paper cites “design by the Creator” in explanation for hand physiology https://t.co/W72O8OWPgq
How is this possible @PLOSONE @PLOS? "...biomechanical characteristic [...] is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/jBHKfwkQfj
Can't believe @PLOSONE let it pass. The editor needs to explain. '..indicate the mystery of the Creator's invention' https://t.co/4AS7CGAJzT
RT @neurobongo: Yikes. RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…
RT @Lignedescience: C'est reparti: créationnisme dans PLOS "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." htt…
RT @NPRougier: "...is the proper design by the Creator to perform..." @PLOS Seriously ? https://t.co/FhfnToHU7Q
Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/dC6QX0VZsF
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
Literally thanking God in this @plosone abstract https://t.co/PmTEdw0MX0 h/t @sennoma
RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx
Creacionismo y #OpenAccess se dan la mano en PLOS ONE https://t.co/0FfyEPtx3o cc @crendueles @medicocritico @jdelacueva @alafuente
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
C'est reparti: créationnisme dans PLOS "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." https://t.co/d9air2Ept3
RT @DBarriosONeill: I'm for #openaccess but a creationist just-so story in @PLOSONE? One accessible paper too many: https://t.co/N5O8Y49…
RT @DBarriosONeill: I'm for #openaccess but a creationist just-so story in @PLOSONE? One accessible paper too many: https://t.co/N5O8Y49…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
new @PLOSONE paper attributes hand design to a creator. huh? https://t.co/SZoYBh0EU3
RT @JohnUrbanGenome: @JohnUrbanGenome I'm guessing this will be brought up in the context of the merits of peer review soon: https://t.co/q…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
What to think about the reviewers and editor who allowed: "...indicates...is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/JFIOG7ysPM
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
RT @DoctorZen: WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s…
RT @DBarriosONeill: I'm for #openaccess but a creationist just-so story in @PLOSONE? One accessible paper too many: https://t.co/N5O8Y49…
A fine response to a Creationist article that made it into the Public Library of Science journal: https://t.co/Ree3WXwRbH
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
RT @BenjPetre: Hey #PLOSONE, is this a joke? Who is 'the Creator' in this article? https://t.co/v7QJuZs8EE #OMG @TheTweetOfGod
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
RT @Protohedgehog: 'Biomechanical features of hands are the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/0zDSysFwAm I'm sorry, I thought this…
Seriously? Peer reviewed paper cites “design by the Creator” in explanation for hand physiology https://t.co/W72O8OWPgq
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @Protohedgehog: 'Biomechanical features of hands are the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/0zDSysFwAm I'm sorry, I thought this…
I'm for #openaccess but a creationist just-so story in @PLOSONE? One accessible paper too many: https://t.co/N5O8Y496ib Is it April 1st?
and no mention of previous work on grasping bananas (https://t.co/udEwCk8ZsC …) ... pseudo-science AND unscholarly?? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh
RT @DoctorZen: WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s…
@JohnUrbanGenome I'm guessing this will be brought up in the context of the merits of peer review soon: https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh
RT @DoctorZen: WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s…
RT @DoctorZen: WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s…
'Biomechanical features of hands are the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/0zDSysFwAm I'm sorry, I thought this was science?
@PLOSONE How could you publish this? https://t.co/4yr6JNl5p8 "indicates proper design by the Creator" !! Can I put Unicorns in my nxt ppr?
RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx
RT @DoctorZen: WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s…
RT @DoctorZen: WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s…
It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @TomRhysMarshall: An Intelligent Design paper in @PLOSONE? Maybe their review process needs more intelligent design... https://t.co/d6mN…
RT @DoctorZen: WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s…
@nfeau @PLOSONE At least some comments are 'entertaining' https://t.co/3yC0YSUZxa
WTF, @PLOSONE? "Our study can.. confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/s3C7AN9i3L
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @nfeau: "Proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/aoiwCS8QdC WTH!!! Seriously @PLOSONE from @BenjPetre
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @MJoao_D: Resposta fantástica https://t.co/JpyTgGy8NF
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @BobOHara: .@jomcinerney @scholarlykitchn I rather like ArthurDent's comment: https://t.co/zw57Vg8Evl
RT @NPRougier: "...is the proper design by the Creator to perform..." @PLOS Seriously ? https://t.co/FhfnToHU7Q
RT @NPRougier: "...is the proper design by the Creator to perform..." @PLOS Seriously ? https://t.co/FhfnToHU7Q
Intelligent design in @PLOSONE ? Say it ain't so! #openaccess https://t.co/aCECqOjdoS
RT @neurobongo: Yikes. RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @LegalizeBrain: Big pb with @PLOS ONE paper mentionning "The Creator" in abstract : https://t.co/DuQ1pdj0U7
Resposta fantástica https://t.co/JpyTgGy8NF
mockery of the #PLoSOne article (seriously?) implying divine intervention in the human hand design https://t.co/q7FlsQU42Y #humor
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @cslamo: #PLOSONE: This needs immediate retraction and scolding of the managing editor https://t.co/Vcrj0iusoo @plosone
.@jomcinerney @scholarlykitchn I rather like ArthurDent's comment: https://t.co/zw57Vg8Evl
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
An Intelligent Design paper in @PLOSONE? Maybe their review process needs more intelligent design... https://t.co/d6mNr1PXiY
Mildly NSFW comment on creationist article in @PLOSONE https://t.co/oqUrDJLZOs
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
¿¿COMO?? Obra de DIOS?? Biomechanics Charact. of Hand Coordination proves God design? https://t.co/Xb5v9hILiN https://t.co/JYMTiThynd
RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh