RT @FoodWhispererRD: So 10000 steps may not be the holy grail of activity - particularly for older women. Even relatively small step counts…
RT @Shyam_Vis: 10,000 steps a day, i.e., about 5 miles a day dictum came from promotional material for a pedometer that was released in Jap…
RT @Shyam_Vis: 10,000 steps a day, i.e., about 5 miles a day dictum came from promotional material for a pedometer that was released in Jap…
10,000 steps a day, i.e., about 5 miles a day dictum came from promotional material for a pedometer that was released in Japan in the 1960s. Finally, some evidence showing that far fewer steps, 7,500, maybe optimal. https://t.co/aLKaMkCvbo
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @TrainerWao: 【歩いた方が死亡率下がる話】 ついにコメディカル皆が信じたセオリーが理論化されてました。 平均4400歩/日の方が、2700歩/日よりも、死亡率が優位に低かった。 これはステップ強度は関係が無かった。 →やっぱり引きこもりは良くない。外に出て動…
RT @TrainerWao: 【歩いた方が死亡率下がる話】 ついにコメディカル皆が信じたセオリーが理論化されてました。 平均4400歩/日の方が、2700歩/日よりも、死亡率が優位に低かった。 これはステップ強度は関係が無かった。 →やっぱり引きこもりは良くない。外に出て動…
RT @manyez: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/ZnKRM8O0c1
1日約7,500歩で死亡リスクは最低。 1万歩は歩きすぎ? https://t.co/nxtdLLG3Ym
RT @manyez: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/ZnKRM8O0c1
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/ZnKRM8O0c1
Wondering how many steps you need to take every day? 10000 right? For some that seems impossible, but a study in JAMA shows even 4400 can help you live longer. The benefit plateaus at 7500. A little walking might go a long way toward better #health. https
RT @TrainerWao: 【歩いた方が死亡率下がる話】 ついにコメディカル皆が信じたセオリーが理論化されてました。 平均4400歩/日の方が、2700歩/日よりも、死亡率が優位に低かった。 これはステップ強度は関係が無かった。 →やっぱり引きこもりは良くない。外に出て動…
There's nothing magic about 10k steps (obviously). But tell that to my now-expired Apple Watch! @JAMA_current https://t.co/LhLe1qxdZZ
RT @TrainerWao: 【歩いた方が死亡率下がる話】 ついにコメディカル皆が信じたセオリーが理論化されてました。 平均4400歩/日の方が、2700歩/日よりも、死亡率が優位に低かった。 これはステップ強度は関係が無かった。 →やっぱり引きこもりは良くない。外に出て動…
Great to see benefit at 4400 steps.
RT @scottlarsonmsc: Rethinking the 10,000 steps recommendation, does it hold up for #OlderAdults? Maybe not. As few a 4,400 steps a days re…
RT @TrainerWao: 【歩いた方が死亡率下がる話】 ついにコメディカル皆が信じたセオリーが理論化されてました。 平均4400歩/日の方が、2700歩/日よりも、死亡率が優位に低かった。 これはステップ強度は関係が無かった。 →やっぱり引きこもりは良くない。外に出て動…
RT @TrainerWao: 【歩いた方が死亡率下がる話】 ついにコメディカル皆が信じたセオリーが理論化されてました。 平均4400歩/日の方が、2700歩/日よりも、死亡率が優位に低かった。 これはステップ強度は関係が無かった。 →やっぱり引きこもりは良くない。外に出て動…
【歩いた方が死亡率下がる話】 ついにコメディカル皆が信じたセオリーが理論化されてました。 平均4400歩/日の方が、2700歩/日よりも、死亡率が優位に低かった。 これはステップ強度は関係が無かった。 →やっぱり引きこもりは良くない。外に出て動こう!! https://t.co/SRHkl1wfqw
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/xkFAkzmdfR
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
@Achille82014447 Evolution is my field, which makes almost all but rocks and quarks understandable using the tools I trade in. Even if it weren't, though, the "stay in your lane" argument is authoritarian gate-keeping meant to maintain the status quo, not
STEPS: death rates decrease with more steps per day and level off at about 7500 steps per day. https://t.co/UkRgVaIF6A US data from older women
RT @NicStraiton: Great challenge...I think for me this paper looking at physical activity https://t.co/EKSByJxCdA @ICoNS_Research https://t…
Great challenge...I think for me this paper looking at physical activity https://t.co/EKSByJxCdA @ICoNS_Research
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
RT @GavrilescuMD: Walking 10,000 steps/day may not be really needed. The health benefits plateau after 7,500, with 5000-7000 steps/d being…
RT @DrLyssette: The goal is easier...what's stopping us now#StepitUp #walkingforhealth #WellMe @GavrilescuMD 👇🏽@CcadWpsa…
Meraklısına ilgili makale , https://t.co/rwHRxnq6da
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
The goal is easier...what's stopping us now#StepitUp #walkingforhealth #WellMe @GavrilescuMD 👇🏽@CcadWpsa @AngladeMDMBA @NicoleSirotinMD @ASiyamMD @EliaDRosarioMD @marianaberho
Study shows decrease risk in mortality with increased activity, leveling out at 7500 steps, intensity doesn’t need to be high #getmoving #dontsit
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
Walking 10,000 steps/day may not be really needed. The health benefits plateau after 7,500, with 5000-7000 steps/d being a reasonable target. https://t.co/rShpq1H55j
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
STEPS: death rates decrease with more steps per day and level off at about 7500 steps per day. https://t.co/o9abQsSLxZ US data from older women
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
RT @Vilavaite: Maybe this justifies the use of wearables🤳 Women must take 4,400 steps per day to increase our #longevity But the effect van…
RT @Vilavaite: Maybe this justifies the use of wearables🤳 Women must take 4,400 steps per day to increase our #longevity But the effect van…
Read this now...
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
More steps per day associated with steady declines in mortality up to approximately 7500 steps/d, beyond which rates leveled. Encouraging finding for the many sedentary individuals for whom 10 000 steps/d pose an unattainable goal
RT @AcinNefro: Gestos senzills i amb gran impacte! #vidaactiva #habitssalidables @Ernesjunyent @AnaHid46 https://t.co/6iUseq7RqC
Gestos senzills i amb gran impacte! #vidaactiva #habitssalidables @Ernesjunyent @AnaHid46
7500 steps/day is the magic number!!!. More steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until approximately 7500 steps/d. Very interesting the "manpo-kei" meaning (10,000 steps meter) https://t.co/G7xYo6lgt5
RT @annacorbalan24: 👉🏼Un estudio revela que hay relación directa entre la media de #pasos que realizan al dia mujeres mayores con las tasas…
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
RT @fitaftercancer: Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Med…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
I love #walking!! Check out the benefits for older women in this abstract from a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (Internal Medicine). https://t.co/efomxTmoRm
Something to think about (while doing your steps. . .)
Did you hear about the 10k steps per day study released at #acsm19? It’s a myth and it’s been busted! I spoke with @Medscape about what these findings mean >> https://t.co/I2gnP5UaBH See the research: https://t.co/sxRnsqqCBX https://t.co/7EPpKo0r9n
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @annacorbalan24: 👉🏼Un estudio revela que hay relación directa entre la media de #pasos que realizan al dia mujeres mayores con las tasas…
RT @Nopanaden: 👉🏻 Más de 16000 mujeres adultas. 👉🏻 El objetivo 10000 pasos/día. 👉🏻 Se observa durante unos 4 años y se analiza. 👉🏻 Por enci…
A new study in JAMA reinforces the link between walking and sustained good health. Even better - you don't have to hit 10K steps in order to have a positive impact. #health #thinkhuman https://t.co/CpJ1wQrLWd
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
Look at this 75 yr old hero, 6 wks after colorectal surgery. Great perspective for many healthy years to come https://t.co/vw3CaFQbdA
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/2qiDWrY7gS
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
RT @MattBoisgontier: After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespecti…
After 60 years old, more steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates until 7500 steps/day irrespective of stepping intensity. https://t.co/XcCJywR8DL https://t.co/cllPdSw0jZ
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @h_okumura: 元論文: https://t.co/ptE002dpcY これも全文は読めないけれど,よく歩いたから長生きできたのか,健康だったからよく歩けたのか,わからない https://t.co/oLezsVyR6z
RT @MuinJKhoury: On the myth of 10,000 steps: Are increased numbers of steps per day associated with lower mortality rates among older wome…
@david_colquhoun No causality implied - agree reverse causality more plausible. Supplementary data from https://t.co/3krwKn7e76 https://t.co/SAP46nFMMO
RT @MuinJKhoury: On the myth of 10,000 steps: Are increased numbers of steps per day associated with lower mortality rates among older wome…
RT @RD_Catherine: Seems when it comes to health, 10000 steps a day is a bit over-rated. Observational study on 16700 older women shows some…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @RD_Catherine: Seems when it comes to health, 10000 steps a day is a bit over-rated. Observational study on 16700 older women shows some…