RT @ymori117: 大規模検査だけでは新型コロナウイルス拡散を防げないことは、今年6月にすでにモデリング研究で示唆されていた。 https://t.co/N6hew1o9Zg
RT @ymori117: 大規模検査だけでは新型コロナウイルス拡散を防げないことは、今年6月にすでにモデリング研究で示唆されていた。 https://t.co/N6hew1o9Zg
RT @ymori117: 大規模検査だけでは新型コロナウイルス拡散を防げないことは、今年6月にすでにモデリング研究で示唆されていた。 https://t.co/N6hew1o9Zg
RT @ymori117: 大規模検査だけでは新型コロナウイルス拡散を防げないことは、今年6月にすでにモデリング研究で示唆されていた。 https://t.co/N6hew1o9Zg
RT @ymori117: 大規模検査だけでは新型コロナウイルス拡散を防げないことは、今年6月にすでにモデリング研究で示唆されていた。 https://t.co/N6hew1o9Zg
RT @ymori117: 大規模検査だけでは新型コロナウイルス拡散を防げないことは、今年6月にすでにモデリング研究で示唆されていた。 https://t.co/N6hew1o9Zg
大規模検査だけでは新型コロナウイルス拡散を防げないことは、今年6月にすでにモデリング研究で示唆されていた。 https://t.co/N6hew1o9Zg
RT @junmurot: 「イギリスの40,162人のデータにより層別化した個人レベルの感染モデルを使用した.PCR検査,隔離,追跡,ソーシャルディスタンスのシナリオの違いによる感染制御のシミュレーションを行った.有効再生産数の減少と新規隔離接触者数を蓋然性の高い前提に基づい…
RT @junmurot: 「イギリスの40,162人のデータにより層別化した個人レベルの感染モデルを使用した.PCR検査,隔離,追跡,ソーシャルディスタンスのシナリオの違いによる感染制御のシミュレーションを行った.有効再生産数の減少と新規隔離接触者数を蓋然性の高い前提に基づい…
[COVID-19 PCR testing issue] The Lancet, June 16, 2020 Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study https://t.co/pfXltNpcdE
RT @junmurot: 「イギリスの40,162人のデータにより層別化した個人レベルの感染モデルを使用した.PCR検査,隔離,追跡,ソーシャルディスタンスのシナリオの違いによる感染制御のシミュレーションを行った.有効再生産数の減少と新規隔離接触者数を蓋然性の高い前提に基づい…
「イギリスの40,162人のデータにより層別化した個人レベルの感染モデルを使用した.PCR検査,隔離,追跡,ソーシャルディスタンスのシナリオの違いによる感染制御のシミュレーションを行った.有効再生産数の減少と新規隔離接触者数を蓋然性の高い前提に基づいて推計した」 https://t.co/fDvIUQoFJv
@gabrielstuff Pour les papiers sur le sujet : - https://t.co/ijzdlrCPjR - https://t.co/pVlJpTGavB et le plus intéressant selon moi : https://t.co/vKbU7o15gA
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study https://t.co/bGf8PQkhrC
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study https://t.co/t8VdCL0Hq5
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study - The Lancet Infectious Diseases https://t.co/rowhsZ0AZ4
RT @Anibal_v_v: La reducción de transmisión de COVID-19 fue 29% para el autoaislamiento de casos sintomáticos en domicilio; 64% para autoai…
La reducción de transmisión de COVID-19 fue 29% para el autoaislamiento de casos sintomáticos en domicilio; 64% para autoaislamiento+cuarentena domiciliaria+rastreo manual de todos los contactos, 47% con rastreo basado únicamente en aplicaciones. https://t
Efectividad del aislamiento, las pruebas, el rastreo de contactos y el distanciamiento físico para reducir la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2 en diferentes entornos: un estudio de modelado matemático #COVID19 https://t.co/tDFqPSKqyk
@SCBriand @DrEricDing Test, Trace, Isolate. https://t.co/ZwbIafrqM0
Chiediti perché. La risposta si chiama #TTI TEST TRACE ISOLATE. https://t.co/4KHDuRS7FG
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @gpollara: I think this is the real benefit the #NHSCOVID19app can bring. People you know you've been in contact with can be remembered…
I think this is the real benefit the #NHSCOVID19app can bring. People you know you've been in contact with can be remembered and traced. Instead it's the unknown contacts that can be impossible to identify. App should do that bit for you (if enough people
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @LarpSerppon: Bra poäng här att smittspårningsappar hjälper till att hitta kontakter som inte är uppenbara för den smittade. https://t.c…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
Bra poäng här att smittspårningsappar hjälper till att hitta kontakter som inte är uppenbara för den smittade.
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @AdamJKucharski: @globalhlthtwit Here are examples of CMMID analysis covering test&trace and physical distancing (which incorporate data…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
I've downloaded the #NHSCOVID19app https://t.co/l3DyfNsrK2
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/wo…
But BC is so different that we only need human tracers... https://t.co/vjPFdG3oE8
Second, the app could help pick up contacts that would otherwise be hard to trace (i.e. causal contacts outside home/work/school) - we estimated that these are the contacts that can really hinder effectiveness of test & trace: https://t.co/hXeVcNnEpa 3
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
On 16 June, a @TheLancetInfDis analysis showed: "a high proportion of cases would need to self-isolate and a high proportion of their contacts to be successfully traced to ensure an effective reproduction number lower than 1." 5/n https://t.co/BevZxrCkGm
@globalhlthtwit Here are examples of CMMID analysis covering test&trace and physical distancing (which incorporate data on heterogeneity in contacts/transmission): -Isolation/tracing: https://t.co/9tngAFDRSg -Superspreading/SAR: https://t.co/AhSdM6BoPv
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
RT @AdamJKucharski: The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnE…
The estimated risk of transmission per contact is higher within household than outside household (https://t.co/hXeVcNnEpa). This means it can be helpful to think of an epidemic as a series of within-household outbreaks, linked by between household transmis
RT @Anibal_v_v: Modelo con datos de UK: el autoaislamiento mas cuarentena domiciliaria mas rastreo de todos los contactos puede reducir en…
RT @MiyagiCorona: @ito_yuta 参考文献です マス・スクリーニング(毎週住民に対して5%ずつPCR検査)しても2%の効果しかないが,感染者の接触追跡と隔離は64%の実効再生産数の減少が期待出来る(Lancet Infect Dis 2020 Jun16…
@ito_yuta 参考文献です マス・スクリーニング(毎週住民に対して5%ずつPCR検査)しても2%の効果しかないが,感染者の接触追跡と隔離は64%の実効再生産数の減少が期待出来る(Lancet Infect Dis 2020 Jun16) https://t.co/zhqn3eZZMQ
Open Access UCL Research: Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study https://t.co/eEmf5TJhjE
I den här artikeln från juni visas att smittspårning och isolering kan reducera smittspridningen med mer än 50%. -> https://t.co/eaBA8J0no2
RT @DiseaseEcology: @AdamJKucharski et al also examined potential efficacy of T-CT-I/Q & suggested a very high fraction of symptomatic case…
RT @DiseaseEcology: @AdamJKucharski et al also examined potential efficacy of T-CT-I/Q & suggested a very high fraction of symptomatic case…
@AdamJKucharski et al also examined potential efficacy of T-CT-I/Q & suggested a very high fraction of symptomatic cases needed to isolate & high fraction of contacts be traced & quarantined to get Rt<1. https://t.co/ELpA7RFJFy
@xynyxs https://t.co/X3BvUkhEqN en https://t.co/OLMZEO4YmV geven enig inzicht
RT @mishoo8: Aislamiento y rastreo de contactos es más efectivo que cualquier medida aislada, incluyendo tamizaje masivo. Interesante aport…
RT @mishoo8: Aislamiento y rastreo de contactos es más efectivo que cualquier medida aislada, incluyendo tamizaje masivo. Interesante aport…
Aislamiento y rastreo de contactos es más efectivo que cualquier medida aislada, incluyendo tamizaje masivo. Interesante aporte de @TheLancet 👉 https://t.co/i3XK5S4i57 para mitigar #COVID19gt #Covid_19
RT @AdamJKucharski: @MackayIM Suspect ongoing limits on gathering size is playing a role. Household size also smallest in OECD (https://t.c…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
RT @DrSergioRalon: Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in…
RT @kayondoking: Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in di…
RT @kayondoking: #COVID19: self-isolation, household quarantine, and manual tracing of all contacts brings Re<1. The fewer average daily co…
#COVID19: self-isolation, household quarantine, and manual tracing of all contacts brings Re<1. The fewer average daily contacts, the lower the Re. https://t.co/fUKIF4Sybo
RT @AdamJKucharski: @MackayIM Suspect ongoing limits on gathering size is playing a role. Household size also smallest in OECD (https://t.c…
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study - The Lancet Infectious Diseases https://t.co/gks7za62UZ
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study - The Lancet Infectious Diseases https://t.co/fU0UNY4WBj
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
What is interesting is that we knew so much already back then - and we seem to have learned very little more since.
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could…
Back in the spring, we looked at potential effects of combined test/trace/distancing, and how limits on contacts could enhance effectiveness of contact tracing (with @petrakle @monkeymyshkin @StephenKissler @FryRsquared & others – now published here: h
RT @driorxho: Hacer pruebas masivas al 5% de la población, sólo reduce la transmisión en 2%. El rastreo/aislamiento efectivo lo hace en 64%…
RT @AdamJKucharski: @MackayIM Suspect ongoing limits on gathering size is playing a role. Household size also smallest in OECD (https://t.c…
@MackayIM Suspect ongoing limits on gathering size is playing a role. Household size also smallest in OECD (https://t.co/YPK2JViPV4), which could help curb outbreaks – within household transmission per-contact generally much higher than between household (
RT @andresvecino: Hacer pruebas masivas al 5% de la población, sólo reduce la transmisión en 2%. El rastreo/aislamiento efectivo lo hace en…
RT @andresvecino: Hacer pruebas masivas al 5% de la población, sólo reduce la transmisión en 2%. El rastreo/aislamiento efectivo lo hace en…
RT @andresvecino: Hacer pruebas masivas al 5% de la población, sólo reduce la transmisión en 2%. El rastreo/aislamiento efectivo lo hace en…
隔離、追跡、検査の効果。 有症陽性者の自己隔離、接触、家族の保護、追跡効果をモデルにより定量評価。 1人の陽性者に対し、15から41人を保護する事でR<1。 ある意味、接触者を能動的に保護する、ベトナム方式の正しさを証明する報告ではないかな。 https://t.co/roNAsjBC28
RT @andresvecino: Hacer pruebas masivas al 5% de la población, sólo reduce la transmisión en 2%. El rastreo/aislamiento efectivo lo hace en…
@pvcanelo @eldestapeweb Paula, este paper como otro de Rodrigo sobre el mismo tema muestra las consecuencias de no aislar a los contactos después de las 48hs de los síntomas: https://t.co/5Yo7raxrlK
RT @andresvecino: Hacer pruebas masivas al 5% de la población, sólo reduce la transmisión en 2%. El rastreo/aislamiento efectivo lo hace en…
RT @andresvecino: Hacer pruebas masivas al 5% de la población, sólo reduce la transmisión en 2%. El rastreo/aislamiento efectivo lo hace en…