↓ Skip to main content

Multipotent Stem Cells of the Hair Follicle

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Multipotent Stem Cells of the Hair Follicle'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Multipotent Stem Cells of the Hair Follicle
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Nestin-Based Reporter Transgenic Mouse Lines.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Discovery of HAP Stem Cells.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Multipotent Stem Cells of the Hair Follicle
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Construction of Tissue-Engineered Nerve Conduits Seeded with Neurons Derived from Hair-Follicle Neural Crest Stem Cells.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Nestin-Expressing Hair-Follicle-Associated Pluripotent (HAP) Stem Cells Promote Whisker Sensory-Nerve Growth in Long-Term 3D-Gelfoam® Histoculture.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation and Culture of Neural Crest Stem Cells from Human Hair Follicles.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Isolation of Mouse Hair Follicle Bulge Stem Cells and Their Functional Analysis in a Reconstitution Assay.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Hair Follicle Regeneration by Transplantation of a Bioengineered Hair Follicle Germ.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Hair Induction by Cultured Mesenchymal Cells Using Sphere Formation.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Stereological Quantification of Cell-Cycle Kinetics and Mobilization of Epithelial Stem Cells during Wound Healing.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Culture of Dermal Papilla Cells from Ovine Wool Follicles: An In Vitro Model for Papilla Size Determination.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Isolation and Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting of Mouse Keratinocytes Expressing β-Galactosidase.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Protocols for Ectopic Hair Growth from Transplanted Whisker Follicles on the Spinal Cord of Mice.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Protocols for Gelfoam(®) Histoculture of Hair-Shaft-Producing Mouse Whisker Follicles Containing Nestin-GFP-Expressing Hair-Follicle-Associated Pluripotent (HAP) Stem Cells for Long Time Periods.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Multipotent Stem Cells of the Hair Follicle
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Highly Efficient Neural Differentiation of CD34-Positive Hair-Follicle-Associated Pluripotent Stem Cells Induced by Retinoic Acid and Serum-Free Medium.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Multipotent Stem Cells of the Hair Follicle
Attention for Chapter 17: Highly Efficient Neural Differentiation of CD34-Positive Hair-Follicle-Associated Pluripotent Stem Cells Induced by Retinoic Acid and Serum-Free Medium.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Highly Efficient Neural Differentiation of CD34-Positive Hair-Follicle-Associated Pluripotent Stem Cells Induced by Retinoic Acid and Serum-Free Medium.
Chapter number 17
Book title
Multipotent Stem Cells of the Hair Follicle
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3786-8_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3784-4, 978-1-4939-3786-8
Authors

Mohsen Sagha, Nowruz Najafzadeh

Editors

Robert M Hoffman

Abstract

Neural differentiation of hair-follicle-associated pluripotent (HAP) stem cells residing in the bulge area is a promising autologous source for stem cell therapy. In the present chapter, we describe the identification and enrichment of CD34(+) HAP stem cells by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), and induce them to differentiate into neuronal and glial cells using defined neural-induction media. The different neural cell populations arising during in vitro differentiation from HAP stem cells are characterized by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunocytochemistry assay.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 38%
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#10,980,857
of 12,358,022 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,686
of 8,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,881
of 263,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,358,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.