↓ Skip to main content

Clostridium difficile

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clostridium difficile'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Typing of Clostridium difficile Isolates
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Direct PCR-Ribotyping of Clostridium difficile
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Clostridium difficile
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Clostridium difficile Genome Editing Using pyrE Alleles
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Use of mCherryOpt Fluorescent Protein in Clostridium difficile
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Fluorescent Reporter for Single Cell Analysis of Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clostridium difficile
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Intestinal Epithelial Cell Response to Clostridium difficile Flagella
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clostridium difficile
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clostridium difficile
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Clostridium difficile
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clostridium difficile
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Clostridium difficile
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clostridium difficile
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Investigating Transfer of Large Chromosomal Regions Containing the Pathogenicity Locus Between Clostridium difficile Strains
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Clostridium difficile
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Clostridium difficile
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Clostridium difficile
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Clostridium difficile
Attention for Chapter 11: Clostridium difficile
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clostridium difficile
Chapter number 11
Book title
Clostridium difficile
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6359-1, 978-1-4939-6361-4
Authors

Sekulović, Ognjen, Fortier, Louis-Charles, Ognjen Sekulović, Louis-Charles Fortier

Editors

Adam P. Roberts, Peter Mullany

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) are present in almost, if not all ecosystems. Some of these bacterial viruses are present as latent "prophages," either integrated within the chromosome of their host, or as episomal DNAs. Since prophages are ubiquitous throughout the bacterial world, there has been a sustained interest in trying to understand their contribution to the biology of their host. Clostridium difficile is no exception to that rule and with the recent release of hundreds of bacterial genome sequences, there has been a growing interest in trying to identify and classify these prophages. Besides their identification in bacterial genomes, there is also growing interest in determining the functionality of C. difficile prophages, i.e., their capacity to escape their host and reinfect a different strain, thereby promoting genomic evolution and horizontal transfer of genes through transduction, for example of antibiotic resistance genes. There is also some interest in using therapeutic phages to fight C. difficile infections.The objective of this chapter is to share with the broader C. difficile research community the expertise we developed in the study of C. difficile temperate phages. In this chapter, we describe a general "pipeline" comprising a series of experiments that we use in our lab to identify, induce, isolate, propagate, and characterize prophages. Our aim is to provide readers with the necessary basic tools to start studying C. difficile phages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,467,278
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,924
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,557
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.