↓ Skip to main content

Clostridium difficile

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clostridium difficile'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Typing of Clostridium difficile Isolates
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Direct PCR-Ribotyping of Clostridium difficile
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Clostridium difficile
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Clostridium difficile Genome Editing Using pyrE Alleles
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Use of mCherryOpt Fluorescent Protein in Clostridium difficile
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Fluorescent Reporter for Single Cell Analysis of Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clostridium difficile
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Intestinal Epithelial Cell Response to Clostridium difficile Flagella
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clostridium difficile
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clostridium difficile
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Clostridium difficile
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clostridium difficile
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Clostridium difficile
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clostridium difficile
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Investigating Transfer of Large Chromosomal Regions Containing the Pathogenicity Locus Between Clostridium difficile Strains
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Clostridium difficile
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Clostridium difficile
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Clostridium difficile
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Clostridium difficile
Attention for Chapter 12: Clostridium difficile
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clostridium difficile
Chapter number 12
Book title
Clostridium difficile
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6359-1, 978-1-4939-6361-4
Authors

Hegarty, John P, Sangster, William, Ashley, Robert E, Myers, Roland, Hafenstein, Susan, Stewart, David B, John P. Hegarty Ph.D., William Sangster, Robert E. Ashley, Roland Myers, Susan Hafenstein, David B. Stewart Sr. M.D., Hegarty, John P., Ashley, Robert E., Stewart, David B., John P. Hegarty, David B. StewartSr., David B. Stewart

Editors

Adam P. Roberts, Peter Mullany

Abstract

Due to the inherent limitations of conventional antibiotics for the treatment of C. difficile infection (CDI), there is a growing interest in the development of alternative treatment strategies. Both bacteriophages and R-type bacteriocins, also known as phage tail-like particles (PTLPs), show promise as potential antibacterial alternatives for treating CDI. Similar to bacteriophages, but lacking a viral capsid and genome, PTLPs remain capable of killing target bacteria. Here we describe our experience in the induction and purification of C. difficile PTLPs. These methods have been optimized to allow production of concentrated, non-contractile, and non-aggregated samples for both sensitivity testing and structural electron microscopy studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,124,905
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#693
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,411
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#124
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.