↓ Skip to main content

Clostridium difficile

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clostridium difficile'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Typing of Clostridium difficile Isolates
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Direct PCR-Ribotyping of Clostridium difficile
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Clostridium difficile
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Clostridium difficile Genome Editing Using pyrE Alleles
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Use of mCherryOpt Fluorescent Protein in Clostridium difficile
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Fluorescent Reporter for Single Cell Analysis of Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clostridium difficile
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Intestinal Epithelial Cell Response to Clostridium difficile Flagella
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clostridium difficile
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clostridium difficile
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Clostridium difficile
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clostridium difficile
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Clostridium difficile
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clostridium difficile
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Investigating Transfer of Large Chromosomal Regions Containing the Pathogenicity Locus Between Clostridium difficile Strains
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Clostridium difficile
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Clostridium difficile
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Clostridium difficile
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Clostridium difficile
Attention for Chapter 6: A Fluorescent Reporter for Single Cell Analysis of Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Fluorescent Reporter for Single Cell Analysis of Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile
Chapter number 6
Book title
Clostridium difficile
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6359-1, 978-1-4939-6361-4
Authors

Carolina Piçarra Cassona, Fátima Pereira, Mónica Serrano, Adriano O. Henriques, Cassona, Carolina Piçarra, Pereira, Fátima, Serrano, Mónica, Henriques, Adriano O

Editors

Adam P. Roberts, Peter Mullany

Abstract

Genetically identical cells growing under homogeneous growth conditions often display cell-cell variation in gene expression. This variation stems from noise in gene expression and can be adaptive allowing for division of labor and bet-hedging strategies. In particular, for bacterial pathogens, the expression of phenotypes related to virulence can show cell-cell variation. Therefore, understanding virulence-related gene expression requires knowledge of gene expression patterns at the single cell level. We describe protocols for the use of fluorescence reporters for single cell analysis of gene expression in the human enteric pathogen Clostridium difficile, a strict anaerobe. The reporters are based on modified versions of the human DNA repair enzyme O ( 6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase, called SNAP-tag and CLIP-tag. SNAP becomes covalently labeled upon reaction with O ( 6)-benzylguanine conjugated to a fluorophore, whereas CLIP is labeled by O ( 6)-benzylcytosine conjugates. SNAP and CLIP labeling is orthogonal allowing for dual labeling in the same cells. SNAP and CLIP cassettes optimized for C. difficile can be used for quantitative studies of gene expression at the single cell level. Both the SNAP and CLIP reporters can also be used for studies of protein subcellular localization in C. difficile.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,590,691
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,540
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,620
of 393,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#205
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.