You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Clostridium difficile
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 14 |
Book title |
Clostridium difficile
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4_14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6359-1, 978-1-4939-6361-4
|
Authors |
Barbanti, Fabrizio, Wasels, François, Spigaglia, Patrizia, Fabrizio Barbanti, François Wasels, Patrizia Spigaglia |
Editors |
Adam P. Roberts, Peter Mullany |
Abstract |
Molecular analysis is an important tool to investigate Clostridium difficile resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB). In particular, the protocols described in this chapter have been designed to investigate the genetic organization of erm(B)-containing elements and to evaluate the capability of these elements to transfer in C. difficile recipient strains using filter mating assay. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 56% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 44% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,206,320
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,144
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,601
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#413
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.