↓ Skip to main content

Clostridium difficile

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clostridium difficile'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Typing of Clostridium difficile Isolates
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Direct PCR-Ribotyping of Clostridium difficile
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Clostridium difficile
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Clostridium difficile Genome Editing Using pyrE Alleles
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Use of mCherryOpt Fluorescent Protein in Clostridium difficile
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Fluorescent Reporter for Single Cell Analysis of Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clostridium difficile
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Intestinal Epithelial Cell Response to Clostridium difficile Flagella
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clostridium difficile
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clostridium difficile
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Clostridium difficile
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clostridium difficile
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Clostridium difficile
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clostridium difficile
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Investigating Transfer of Large Chromosomal Regions Containing the Pathogenicity Locus Between Clostridium difficile Strains
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Clostridium difficile
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Clostridium difficile
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Clostridium difficile
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Clostridium difficile
Attention for Chapter 20: Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine
Chapter number 20
Book title
Clostridium difficile
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4_20
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6359-1, 978-1-4939-6361-4
Authors

Richard R. Rustandi Ph.D., Feng Wang, Catherine Lancaster, Adam Kristopeit, David S. Thiriot, Jon H. Heinrichs, Rustandi, Richard R, Wang, Feng, Lancaster, Catherine, Kristopeit, Adam, Thiriot, David S, Heinrichs, Jon H, Richard R. Rustandi, Rustandi, Richard R., Thiriot, David S., Heinrichs, Jon H.

Editors

Adam P. Roberts, Peter Mullany

Abstract

Ion-exchange (IEX) chromatography is one of many separation techniques that can be employed to analyze proteins. The separation mechanism is based on a reversible interaction between charged amino acids of a protein to the charged ligands attached to a column at a given pH. This interaction depends on both the pI and conformation of the protein being analyzed. The proteins are eluted by increasing the salt concentration or pH gradient. Here we describe the use of this technique to characterize the charge variant heterogeneities and to monitor stability of four protein antigen components of a Clostridium difficile vaccine. Furthermore, the IEX technique can be used to monitor reversion to toxicity for formaldehyde-treated Clostridium difficile toxins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,998,624
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,040
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,648
of 393,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#158
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.