RT @jilliannec: Mortality benefits of step counting level off at 7500. Good, practical news for those with #heartfailure that have been tor…
RT @jilliannec: Mortality benefits of step counting level off at 7500. Good, practical news for those with #heartfailure that have been tor…
RT @jilliannec: Mortality benefits of step counting level off at 7500. Good, practical news for those with #heartfailure that have been tor…
Mortality benefits of step counting level off at 7500. Good, practical news for those with #heartfailure that have been torturing themselves trying to achieve a ‘norm’ made more difficult by a weak heart and difficulty breathing. #CardioTwitter https://t.c
RT @YoshimuraYosh: Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine h…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine https://t.co/OPCndDS9KV
평균나이 72세인 여성 16만명을 추적조사한 다른 연구에서도 많이 걸으면 사망률이 낮아졌음. 다만 하루 7500보를 넘어가면 추가적인 효과는 보이지 않았음. https://t.co/TRLkRK1nrk
More steps taken per day are associated with lower mortality rates, until approximately 7500 steps/d, as per this study published in JAMA. -> https://t.co/cHCc9aFIQi #exercise #health
Hausfrauen werden schon mit 4.500 Schritten pro Tag alt. Lust auf Homeoffice? https://t.co/KXPBZFkSFr
Full paper for this chart one is here: https://t.co/Yuz91LWJPg Holds up in Meta-analysis eg: https://t.co/bYoVbvxtvs
RT @moritaku6: 平均年齢72歳の女性741人を対象としたコホート研究では平均で約4400歩/日であった女性は、約2700歩/日であった最も活動的でない女性と比較して、4.3年の追跡期間中の死亡率が有意に低かった。1日あたりの歩数が増えると、死亡率は次第に低下し、約…
RT @moritaku6: 平均年齢72歳の女性741人を対象としたコホート研究では平均で約4400歩/日であった女性は、約2700歩/日であった最も活動的でない女性と比較して、4.3年の追跡期間中の死亡率が有意に低かった。1日あたりの歩数が増えると、死亡率は次第に低下し、約…
平均年齢72歳の女性741人を対象としたコホート研究では平均で約4400歩/日であった女性は、約2700歩/日であった最も活動的でない女性と比較して、4.3年の追跡期間中の死亡率が有意に低かった。1日あたりの歩数が増えると、死亡率は次第に低下し、約7500歩/日で平準化されました https://t.co/ZjJzVVCgWr
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @michaelbhaskar: 7.5k steps per day is the real 10k steps day.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
This actually makes me feel better because the only part of me that *feels* almost 37 is below the knees 👵🏻
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
So many folks will be devastated (or relieved?) that 10,000 steps/day don’t matter.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @michaelbhaskar: 7.5k steps per day is the real 10k steps day.
7.5k steps per day is the real 10k steps day.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Muy bueno! Pero habría que ver subgrupos con factores de riesgo similares
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @ma_hamer: The 10,000 step/day guideline was not so far off the mark #PhysicalActivity #health https://t.co/nZue2WYWXo
RT @Trisha_the_doc: Very useful to see! I allowed myself to get very stressed back in 2017/18 that I wasn’t achieving 10,000 a day without…
RT @Trisha_the_doc: Very useful to see! I allowed myself to get very stressed back in 2017/18 that I wasn’t achieving 10,000 a day without…
RT @drkathrynmannix: Hooray! I rarely get to 10k steps daily but it turns our that's ok. Keep active, peeps, and here's some actual evidenc…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Less than 10,000 will get you there
RT @drkathrynmannix: Hooray! I rarely get to 10k steps daily but it turns our that's ok. Keep active, peeps, and here's some actual evidenc…
RT @Trisha_the_doc: Very useful to see! I allowed myself to get very stressed back in 2017/18 that I wasn’t achieving 10,000 a day without…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Hooray! I rarely get to 10k steps daily but it turns our that's ok. Keep active, peeps, and here's some actual evidence to think about. Next Q: is activity the root of longevity in these analyses, or is being active simply a marker of fitness? Off for my r
This is really interesting.
RT @Trisha_the_doc: Very useful to see! I allowed myself to get very stressed back in 2017/18 that I wasn’t achieving 10,000 a day without…
Very useful to see! I allowed myself to get very stressed back in 2017/18 that I wasn’t achieving 10,000 a day without pacing the bedroom at 11pm. Now I’m concentrating on generally being active and improving strength and balance.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Will the findings of this study encourage more healthcare professionals to promote #PhysicalActivity? A benefit from as few…
@PRB_Raimond Jalutamine on hea ja Economist ka, aga teine kord ära tunne end kehvasti, kui 8000 või 10 000 sammu asemel tuleb 7500 :) https://t.co/MIleIIijFC
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
My mom is 74, walks several miles a day, and is in PHENOMENAL shape. I've got another relative a year or two younger who barely walks from the couch to the kitchen. He's had two or three heart attacks, is on oxygen, and every holiday that passes I'm amaz
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
Notably, I’m also not part of the population studied here...#moderatelyolderman
Unclear if there is greater #health benefit with over 7500 #steps per day. But if 2500 steps = ~ 1 mile, then my 10,000 daily step goal confirms that “I’m going the extra mile” in 2020. @OchsnerHealth #goingtheextramile https://t.co/rcsEwKKweu
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
RT @Mangan150: For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700…
That's about 30-60 minutes. Decent goal to hit every day, especially if you're busy. (But don't forget to nose breathe the whole time!)
For older women, as few as ~4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700 steps/d. Plateau at 7500 steps/d, where mortality was 60% less. ~3 miles daily for max benefit from walking. https://t.co/2xVh9
小説すばる2020年2月号掲載、津川友介氏の連載第10回目のテーマは「運動」。2019年にけっこう話題になっていたJAMA Internal Medicine の論文を取り上げています。1日1万歩も歩かなくていい、7500歩でOKという内容。 https://t.co/tZ3yeUOEvW
RT @Amreen_Mahmood: Sounds interesting @unit_ccsrr @johnsolomon78 @Coralie_English https://t.co/TNLnd10fsY
Mortality rates drop with even 7500 steps a day ! How can you get yours? Walk to the shop? School run? Lunch break walk? Get off a stop early? Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/OeGFwo7tFF. htt
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/bVUNYjliFR
RT @RomaanaMir: Echoes @JAMAInternalMed publication of all cause mortality and step count. Keep >7500/day! #QOL #lungcancer #lcsm https://…
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Will the findings of this study encourage more healthcare professionals to promote #PhysicalActivity? A benefit from as few…
RT @psychonsultant: 健康のために、とりま1日4,363歩 高齢女性16,741人の歩行量を平均4.3年追跡して「1日の歩数と死亡率」を調べると… 1日約2,700歩を歩いた人に比べて、約4,400歩以上を歩いた人は死亡リスクが低かった 1,000歩/日…